• Announcements

    • MannDude

      Current state of vpsBoard   02/04/2017

      Dear vpsBoard members and guests:

      Over the last year or two vpsBoard activity and traffic has dwindled. I have had a change of career and interests, and as such am no longer an active member of the web hosting industry.

      Due to time constraints and new interests I no longer wish to continue to maintain vpsBoard. The web site will remain only as an archive to preserve and showcase some of the great material, guides, and industry news that has been generated by members, some of which I remain in contact to this very day and now regard as personal friends.

      I want to thank all of our members who helped make vpsBoard the fastest growing industry forum. In it's prime it was an active and ripe source of activity, news, guides and just general off-topic banter and fun.

      I wish all members and guests the very best, whether it be with your business or your personal projects.

      -MannDude
DomainBop

The 1 Million Euro Custom Ubuntu Kernel

7 posts in this topic

OVH offers users  the choice of using its modified custom Linux kernels or the regular distro's kernel.  Ubuntu's license contains a clause that requires anyone who distributes a modified version of Ubuntu to get approval from Ubuntu and pay a license fee to use the Ubuntu mark. Canonical/Ubuntu wants OVH to pay a licensing fee of 1-2 euros monthly for each installation which over the course of a year would amount to about 1 million euros.  According to the article Canonical (owner of Ubuntu) is also asking Dreamhost, which also uses a modified version of Ubuntu,  to pay a licensing fee.

(google translate was invented so you could read the French articles I link tohttp://www.clubic.com/pro/actualite-e-business/actualite-809784-ubuntu-canonical-payer-ovh.html

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Well, yes. The point of trademarks is to allow the trade mark owner to control who uses, and impose conditions.

Red Haw will not let you redistribute anything containing its trade mark at all - which is why CentOS exists and no one has a problem with that.

So call it something else, or use Debian.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

A company of that size has lawyers who should have advised them on Trademark matters.

I'm guessing they might rename it. Obuntu? as in O(vh)buntu :P

3 people like this

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

They cannot give it a name that is similar - that is still covered by the trademark. Similarly CentOS could not use a name like "Red Cap".

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

^^  likelihood of confusion (link to EU directive) rules out Obuntu.

Quote

I'm guessing they might rename it.

Renaming it would solve the trademark issue but Canonical also requires that ALL binaries (not just the ones containing the trademark) be recompiled because they claim a copyright on the original Ubuntu binaries (see FSF member bitching about Canonical's recompiling requirement here: https://mjg59.dreamwidth.org/35969.html?thread=1419649 ) .

edited to add: Ubuntu IP Rights Policy

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

OVH can use the following paragraph:

Quote

You can redistribute Ubuntu, but only where there has been no modification to it.

You can redistribute Ubuntu in its unmodified form, complete with the installer images and packages provided by Canonical (this includes the publication or launch of virtual machine images).

as OVH is modified all kernels therefore can redistribute the Ubuntu.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
On undefined at 4:50 PM, DomainBop said:

 

Renaming it would solve the trademark issue but Canonical also requires that ALL binaries (not just the ones containing the trademark) be recompiled because they claim a copyright on the original Ubuntu binaries (see FSF member bitching about Canonical's recompiling requirement here: https://mjg59.dreamwidth.org/35969.html?thread=1419649 ) .

That changed, at least, as far as GPL licensed binaries go:

https://sfconservancy.org/news/2015/jul/15/ubuntu-ip-policy/

There may be a problem with binaries under BSD and similar licences (probably depending on jurisdiction though). Even if Canonical could claim copyright on those binaries, they may not bother in practice.

The big sticking point seems to be the name. If its recognisably Ubuntu they have to pay up, if it is not no one who wants Ubuntu will use it.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Similar Content

    • By poomrokc
      Hello , sorry for the confusing title ,I do not speak english as my first language.(and also sorry if the topic does not fit here)
      Problem background: I just want to create a website as a competitive program grader for my school. Like complie and run source code on the server. So below is my idea and i would like some help/suggestions before i do it,I still don't know if this will work.
      Mysql usage:
      The problem one is that i would use one of the table as my user-submission queue.When user submit a code, I first put it in this table(i suppose it put the new row in the bottom of the table?) .
      Python program usage:
      I would run a 24/7 program on my server that check every 10 second  if the queue table is not empty, just run the grading process(I know how to do it) and then pop it off the queue.Then check again.
       
      PHP usage:
      When a person submit code, i will use php to put it on the queue table,but it may be the same time my python program is popping something off the queue table too. This is where I get confuse whether it will work or not.(Other usage of the php is just things about web interface which I had done before and know what to do)
       
      So,would this idea even work? Will it break my server or something?As a competitive programmer guy I don't know much snd will greatly appreciate any help from u guys. :)
       
      Thank you very much.
    • By DomainBop
      DreamHost's OpenStack powered DreamCompute has come out of its 2 year  beta and entered general availability.  This is actually a nice full featured OpenStack offering compared to GoDaddy's recent OpenStack Cloud launch (which still felt like a beta to me), or OVH's Public Cloud, both of which are still missing important features that many of their OpenStack competitors offer (OVH: real private networking and IPv6 are still "coming soon", GoDaddy" no IPv6, no Object Storage, no ISO's, no extra disks, etc).  While Bob Parsons at GoDaddy was chasing elephants, DreamHost was getting heavily involved with the development of OpenStack which may explain why their offering is more feature complete than GoDaddy's...
      My main reason for taking two minutes to post this however is because with this launch DreamHost is shaking up the US hourly billing pricing market with 1GB for $6  in an industry where $10=1GB had become the standard across hourly cloud competitors like DO, Vultr, GoDaddy, Atlantic.net, Cordero, and many others.   (OVH/Online.net/Aruba and others already shook things up in the European public cloud market with their pricing)
       
      Their DreamObjects object storage prepaid plans also have attractive pricing:  200 GB for $4.50 monthly .  Usage based pricing plans are also available priced at 2.5¢/GB of storage plus 5¢/GB of download.
      press release: http://www.marketwired.com/press-release/dreamhost-announces-general-availability-of-dreamcompute-2112097.htm
      documentation: https://help.dreamhost.com/hc/en-us/categories/202115418-DreamCompute-Cloud-Servers
      site: https://www.dreamhost.com/cloud/computing/
      TL;DR more downward pricing pressure in the ultracompetitive public cloud market.   It will be interesting to see who buys who and who is left standing 2-3 years from now...
       
    • By fm7
      Ubuntu on Windows 10 -- The Ubuntu Userspace for Windows Developers
    • By fm7
      Redirecting over and over to the login page.
       
      http://travaux.ovh.net/?do=details&id=17229
    • By DomainBop
      If any of you OVH based providers want to set yourself apart from the crowd and be the first to start offering PowerKVM VPS's out of RBX for under $7 monthly I might be interested.  A Power8 OpenStack offering would be even better as long as you keep it under $7  (it's been impossible to find a Power8 VPS since OVH/Runabove ended their Power8 lab).  :P
      ***
      SoYouStart launched a new server line with amazing specs for the price.:
      Virtualization options for Power8 servers: https://www.ibm.com/support/knowledgecenter/linuxonibm/liaam/liaamvirtoptions.htm
      MongoDB and MariaDB already offer Power8 versions so these servers would be great for heavy data processing with large databases...big data