Search results

It's funny how those of us providers that care more about a quality network than making a quick buck don't seem to have issues with Spamhaus.  Funnier still when those that greedily get their hands dirty start crying about the consequences. It's more than just spam.  The amount of abuse (brute...

We know. Your lack of self-awareness leads to great spectacle for us that just kick back and watch your repeated embarrassments. At the end of the day kiddo - no amount of your lies, flamboyance, or exaggeration will change reality and give you the importance and self-worth you so desperately...

This kid will try anything to change the topic away from uncomfortable truths, won't he.

I would be interested to know the recipe for Popeye's Biscuits.  Or the rolls at Logan's Roadhouse.  Perhaps for Jack Daniel's iced tea as well. I always have to stop and do a double-take when someone underhandedly begs for confidential information.  Or when people straight out ask "Hey, that's...

Not illegal, but suspicious for sure.  Honestly, I feel the bank was in the right for asking the cops to check it out - proactive security is far preferable to reactive.

At least one bloke got picked up by the cops here for doing that.  Bank reported repeat transactions from someone in a mask, so the cops sat and waited.  Turned out to be 'legit' (just a kid doing something dumb)... but hey.

And they still wouldn't help me after I threatened to just go to another bank!  The nerve!

"Here's the Atlantic.. sink or swim (back to NY)"

If you don't trust your provider, why would they ever trust you? I deal with this pretty frequently, people trying to sign up under anonymous or falsified information ("Fake Name Generators" aren't as reliable as you think against experienced auditors).  Tons of excuses; Some providers are...

Do you really think he was ever actually independant?

...there's a huge difference between security/privacy and anonymity.  Why exactly would you be encouraging this?

....that's why I use the setup I do. Just to clarify - I was making commentary, not asking for advice.

...that's what I just said.

That's pretty much how I've always felt - I still use 200-500GB drives in raid rather than larger TB drives, mainly due to "Man, if I fill that thing up and it dies on me, I'm going to lose a LOT of stuff".

Ah, but ignoring the guy is a completely different matter :P  Mr Censored could've just stopped responding after the answer he did give - it was clear enough he wasn't going to give the guy what he wanted. Pushy types like that simply don't stop until they finally realize things won't go their...

Why would rewording 'No' have resulted in a different outcome?  These types don't take the hint, no matter how plain you make it to them.

I will say that Arch is one of the most frustrating distros to virtualize.. KVM may be fine but there was always something breaking on OpenVZ.. to the point we had to put up an "Unsupported, use at own risk" disclaimer.

Daughter made me breakfast this morning, and told me "thanks for being a breeder".   >_>

Law is irrelevant.  I simply won't help skids.