Search results

I am not complaining at all, I told Francisco I expect this kind of treatment way before even posting to compare buyvm vs cc rule on let. How many other topics were split and given titles like this ? I am here just naming the facts, what happened and what this means. Let's reiterate: 1...

Not really, he just put the name and didnt change it when I protested, he did ask for a name, probably in jest. And, neah, the "annoying" stuff isnt working, I posted in the offtopic section, far from "every thread" in the most often seen places. I always considered that whoever is looking for...

So I see the fake accounts started the campaign for the ban :) Good job, make owners afraid I will scare visitors away, threaten to leave, threaten Prometeus, let's see if it will work. I am genuinely curious. It did work inthe past. For someone who has nothing to hide this is quite an effort...

That is not only about the ban, it is about the insults, the lack of minimal decency, the lies and the cover-ups, now add to that hacking threats.  I do not need any reputation, no forum will pay me since I always tell the truth, even when inconvenient for the owners, therefore I can expect...

Indeed, whenever BuyVM will play saints and cry "DC fault" I will be there to remind everyone how they behaved when they were pulling the strings in LET and ridiculing everyone who had an issue with the dc. They can hope time will make everyone forget and it is working indeed, but a few people...

This has nothing to do with prometeus, as i said, this is from Before I even had a prometeus VM, not to mention working for him.  It started when BuyVM tried to justify the banning of an app which posed 0 risks (relay nodes) or surcharging it later because there was a moral problem with alloing...

You're in damage control again, I see HEP is stepping in again because this doesnt go well for you now, but who's fault is that ? We will see if things taken out of context will continue to work now. You had a great thing there, too bad you decided to attack a whole group of people to cover for...

This is an old isue, I only mentioned it in the historical context.  It started from CC's doings and the attack of Spirit against DomainBop. He said "the people" are behind him when he said DomainBop was annoying (really ? poor guy has been a source of excellent historical data, I dont think...

1. I protest topic split. First, FFS, it is the off-topic section. Second, it has everything to do with the way CC and BuyVM ruled that place, so it is not standing on it's own. BuyVM has own problems and the company has nothing to do with it, only the people running it also run LET and employed...

This had never anything to do with noble goals or the righteousness of fighting anonymity. It was purely a business decision, we will spare a few bucks if we forbid high bw apps that are likely to use more than a few % of the sold traffic.  If he kept it like meh, that Tor and anonymity thing...

How the heck quoting works here ? Anyway, I wont post any screenshot without his permission, but you already know that as you say he told you.. I even reminded him those claims are recorded. Since CC will ban me, I made many screenshots not only about Francisco, but also about Spirit, the...

I have nothing to discuss with you, you didnt withdraw the insults and until you do you are not worth talking to. Francisco himself admitted it, I think you two should meet and ask each other what proof I need to post, the PMs where he was telling me that or where he was threatening to hack...

I also agree on Spirit's part. He was the one opening a thread asking why I was banned (and a few others with me). Nobody had a clear explanation, some tried to make up lies that I was supported DDoSing LET even tho nobody could find a post in which i said those things, nor show some PMs.  I...

Then dont let me. You didnt before either, this is what i try to say, CC does the same you did, but now you are the good guys and defend freedom of speech when you did exactly the same when you ruled the place.  I wouldnt play the saint if I were you, I would prove I learned something from the...

They said they are doing it on moral grounds because we are all child molesters, then they changed tune when quite a few people on let were proven to be "child molesters" and they said they do it because it is risky. When I proved that a relay will not be risky at all, they slapped a 5$...

The issue with buyvm is that they suddenly started attacking Tor hosts as being at least immoral if not outright child abusers. That struck me as strange and i started an investigation for 2 months and slowly reached the problem, they were serving thousands of customers each with at least 500 GB...

I know Spirit is a nice guy, but he is so bitter these day that he doesnt see the fun. I dont know what they feed him, but I sent him this as a joke and he went crazy attacking me with bad words he should have been banned for close to Aldryic style that blew me away and I played along a bit. He...

 !! Thread was split from: !! - MD Do you know that CC still denies it ? mpkossen himself told me he doesnt think there is any truth in these "investigations" and Spirit said he has to protect the innocents from the lynchmob here :) As long as the lies will continue from there, full...

Yes, and it is only a question of time before last mile ISPs will add offers for ipv6 only. That will happen in the next 2 years on a large enough scale to matter, i think, then content providers will start thinking about it.

I am more optimistic. The IPv4 mafia will raise prices much sooner than an actual depletion will occur and it will gradually convince people to at least add ipv6 to be ready. I think in 5 years will no longer be suicide to launch IPv6 only sites as most people will at least be able to use...