Search results

And if you'd prefer that, instead of another table, it appears in the Log tab of the client profile: https://github.com/damianharouff/whmcshook-recordlogin This would be the solution for individuals who may be skurred/uneducated on running their own SQL queries.

  Those are my favorite! I like to remind them that resellers are bound to our own AUP/TOS, the same as clients.

Isn't part of the problem with Solus is that they're not users of the system, and therefore their development doesn't align with the needs of providers? Which would be what we're avoiding with not implementing Xen into the panel.

I agree. There shouldn't be rules or other derision in place for providers then offering their services, as long as what the provider is offering matches what the customer is looking for. In other words, no RobertClarke's responding with "We can do this in Dallas." for someone looking for VPS...

Tell me why... that's what i'm trying to understand, as we do not do Xen ourselves nor do I have any Xen VMs. What does Xen do that KVM does not?

...for anyone who doesn't already offer Xen. You're probably aware that we're currently architecting a replacement VPS panel that we'll eventually license to anyone who wants to use it.  We're seriously considering not implementing Xen, as we don't use it ourselves. Tell me how i'm wrong. Go!

So far, i'm liking vpsBoard better than LET.

  This. We've had clients who are known to be or have been members of HF, and we've never advertised there.

I'd really like to point out that Fraudrecord shouldn't be used as a be-all, end-all fraud detection tool. It's just that: a tool; something providers can use in their usual process, with good judgement and input, to determine to carry a client or not. Here is, for example, a good...