Search results

Are you in control of the host node or do you only have VPS access?  

Just for some context; how long was the client waiting on a reply (not that it should matter)

Oh really? My dual e5-2620 went offline with them yesterday (no IPMI etc).  I only hope they didn't give it to GVH, as I was still technically trying to troubleshoot the problem with them.

Im in the UK, will this be a problem?

That indeed makes sense.  You have to be a firm gatekeeper.  Is the iPad new?

You mean like Paypal?  Or is there another way to pay through a proxy?  Escrow?

Test IP for Phoenix?

Possible to limit it to those who have already posted in this thread?  That way someone who then manages to use it won't get a "Sorry, someone has already claimed it"

Well at least everyone now has Carte Blanche to try.  This is going to get ugly. 

Most likely because they are with Colocrossing/HVH in Buffalo, NY.

Crack?  You do understand overages are paid for outside of your initial commit.  You generally don't benefit from commit pricing with overages.  $4 is a very reasonable overage rate and was my best case.

If targeted at GVH I don't think this is a good idea.  Even if one VPS maxed out its bandwidth allocation it's likely to push GVH into overages.  Even if we look at a reasonable $4 Mbps it's going to very easy to slap $1000s worth of dollars of overages onto the company.  This is severely going...

When you're advertising 100TB you're going to attract a lot of high bandwidth users.

Just to update, that Serverhub bent over backwards after the initial problems.  The server was fully refunded and I was offered a chance to stay on free of charge in addition to being given personal contact information for key personnel.  I'll unlikely be continuing business with them; however...

Wasn't this thread started in direct response to a lie you sent out to your customers in a an email which quite clearly said you didn't outsource.  "That was then this is now" doesn't quite cut it.  We're talking less than two weeks between both truths. What you've said makes no sense...

Im not sure how the IPv4 savings make this sustainable; although good luck.

Well Patrick took a look at pointed out something pretty obvious that I missed regarding the disks.  I'll ask if the drives can be swapped as the performance is not going to going any higher with the currently installed disks.

Although 'not great' for SSD cached, 50-100 MB/s is perfectly usable.  In terms of uptime, was this hardware or network related? 

I looked that table up and down before posting.  Shame on me!

It was my thinking too.  I appreciate the offer Patrick.  I've checked everything I can possibly think of and have now handed it back over to the server provider who are giving it the once over, re-configuring RAID and doing an OS install themselves. If this heads nowhere, I'll shoot you a PM...