Search results

It is not. PCCW and HE are simply too well peered for IPv6, not a lot flows inbound via Cogent. It's there if needed, though. From the Cogent looking glass for one of the LA blocks, BGP routing table entry for 2602:FFE8:300::/40, version 110148281 Paths: (1 available, best #1, table Default)...

We have HE + Cogent (and Tinet + PCCW) in LA. Give us a try if you want -- https://www.cloudshards.com/budgetvpshosting.php LG is public if you need to test -- http://ca.lg.cloudshards.net/ Thanks.

This is most likely what happened, quite common in the industry sadly.

4-rc1 is essentially 3.20, namechange = shenanigans.

It's the same thing as reverse path filtering, and no -- it's not much of a knob. Most effective when applied between PE <-> CE topologies, i.e: in the access layer.

>> Can you imagine retailers denying your business because you returned a thingamob to some other retailer somewhere once? Once, no. But if you repeatedly behave in erratic ways, I would be very interested in learning about that -- and subsequently denying you service to not waste my resources...

Nice necro.

What is fitness?

I use Sprunge for that (http://sprunge.us/)

Why use netcat at all for this, wouldn't embedded httpds be better if resource usage is a concern?

We use connectivity from pnap as well, no problems at all.

The SSL error is most likely due to a missing intermediate certificate.

Decent guy, recommended from my side too =)

Which mongoloid has so many problems with pastebin sites? <.<'

The 'real' justification for doing this is ND entries on layer 3 switches. While a /64 does come with 2 ^ (128-64) addresses, most providers' layer 3 switching gear is incapable of handling that many entries. So, while technically you indeed are allocated a lot of addresses -- but you won't...

No good sir, it is not us.

It's an unauthenticated remote shell that happens to have blogging functions. Always been the most insecure 'app' I know of, I don't see this changing anytime soon.

There's no need to be a dick, it's an useful service that I'm sure most of us enjoy using.

As someone generally involved with service provider networking, I would recommend that you not disclose upstream capacity publicly. Upstream filtering is usually dubious at best, and someone determined enough usually has no problem getting around it to flood you offline.

Thunderbird, regardless of platform has served me well.