C2750 hardware wise would run 2 - 4 Source game Servers. It's a powerful machine that's really economical (power-wise). Totally awesome.Hello,
Would the C2750 be capable of running 2 - 4 game servers, more specifically source engine based (TF2)? Thank you.
I'm usually pretty good with hardware myself, but I can't really decide regarding the Avaton. E3 based servers start at 36€/mo (Online.net), which is out of my budget right now. The Avaton scores at ~3900 while the E3 1220 v2 hovers at ~6500 last time I checked, but these numbers can be a bit tricky.If you're buying, it's probably worthwhile to just get an E3. It's only a drop more expensive and you won't see any savings versus the Avoton, since you'd still be paying for a full amp, most likely.
If you're renting, that's a different story. I don't know much about TF2, but I would assume that it can run quite a few. It's about half as powerful as an E3.
It does look really solid on paper.It's a powerful machine that's really economical (power-wise). Totally awesome.
Yeah my statement may or may not be considered a blanket statement. So I mean it depends on how many players and what you're planning on having on there.I'm usually pretty good with hardware myself, but I can't really decide regarding the Avaton. E3 based servers start at 36€/mo (Online.net), which is out of my budget right now. The Avaton scores at ~3900 while the E3 1220 v2 hovers at ~6500 last time I checked, but these numbers can be a bit tricky.
It does look really solid on paper.
If you're renting, it's fine. Since you can just upgrade at any time.I'm usually pretty good with hardware myself, but I can't really decide regarding the Avaton. E3 based servers start at 36€/mo (Online.net), which is out of my budget right now. The Avaton scores at ~3900 while the E3 1220 v2 hovers at ~6500 last time I checked, but these numbers can be a bit tricky.
It does look really solid on paper.
The Avotons are 15.99€ ($19.95) at Online.net...about 1/2 the price of the cheapest E3 anyone is offering.If you're buying, it's probably worthwhile to just get an E3. It's only a drop more expensive
http://serverbear.com/benchmark/2014/07/13/J4Vi9fXzig15xIHQOnline.net
That's called renting, not buying.The Avotons are 15.99€ ($19.95) at Online.net...about 1/2 the price of the cheapest E3 anyone is offering.
http://serverbear.com/benchmark/2014/07/13/J4Vi9fXzig15xIHQ
5-month mini review: server works-no downtime, network works (aside from 3 minutes of packet loss on September 23rd and 4 minutes on 9/28)
I tend to run my servers as vanilla as possible (TFTrue). The Online.net offer either comes with 1TB SATA3 or 120GB SSD (Intel S3500). I'd say the Intel drive is the clear winner here.It really depends on what you are doing and how you want to run your servers.
The source engine was built back in early 2000, if I remember correctly, and has always been a big hog on I/O. With that in mind, you could in theroy run ~8 tf2 servers on one of these little puppies. This is because source is not multi-threaded, at least since the last time I checked. So each tf2 server would at max be using one CPU. However, I would only suggest doing 24 players and a light load on plugins. This assumes you have enough IO to make it work, meaning buy a lot of high speed HDDs and raid10 them, or a better option, throw a bunch of SSDs in it, and try and localize most of the servers to seperate SSDs, like 4 servers on this ssd and 4 on the other.
Just a note however, TF2 community wise is going south. There is higher and higher number of servers and less and less players. Two years ago there was ~150k players on tf2. Now there is ~75k peak players per day. If you are starting a new community I suggest looking at CS:GO or another game entirely. At which point, E3 is the way to go. There is also the possibility that TF2 will be moved to source2, in which case, all bets are off on what it will do and how it will work.
Finally a note of caution, this is just a basis on what I know of TF2 and how it works, it is very possible these Avaton processors will not be enough as Nikki mentioned, but in my oppinion it should. A good suggestion would be to rent one and get everyone to jump on and watch the performance of the server.
So you will use higher tickrate, on single c2750 core you will get frame loss.competitive matches/pickups and lobbies.
The Avoton drives are 1TB SATA3 HGST HTS721010A9E630 (HGST Travelstar 7K 1000...2 1/2" drive) and 120GB SSD Intel SSDSA2BW120G3 (Intel Series 320 not the S3500 series).The Online.net offer either comes with 1TB SATA3 or 120GB SSD (Intel S3500). I'd say the Intel drive is the clear winner here.
Intel SSD in DC2wget freevps.us/downloads/bench.sh -O - -o /dev/null|bash
CPU model : Intel® Atom CPU C2750 @ 2.40GHz
Number of cores : 8
CPU frequency : 1200.000 MHz
Total amount of ram : 7994 MB
Total amount of swap : 7811 MB
System uptime : 107 days, 16:58,
Download speed from CacheFly: 39.5MB/s
Download speed from Coloat, Atlanta GA: 14.2MB/s
Download speed from Softlayer, Dallas, TX: 12.5MB/s
Download speed from Linode, Tokyo, JP: 7.24MB/s
Download speed from i3d.net, Rotterdam, NL: 24.9MB/s
Download speed from Leaseweb, Haarlem, NL: 38.0MB/s
Download speed from Softlayer, Singapore: 7.78MB/s
Download speed from Softlayer, Seattle, WA: 13.2MB/s
Download speed from Softlayer, San Jose, CA: 11.2MB/s
Download speed from Softlayer, Washington, DC: 21.4MB/s
I/O speed : 70.8 MB/s
Just for comparison, these are the results from a single drive server with a Corsair Force LS SSD (an i5-3570 I grabbed for 22 euros monthly from SeFlow)wget freevps.us/downloads/bench.sh -O - -o /dev/null|bash
CPU model : Intel® Atom CPU C2750 @ 2.40GHz
Number of cores : 8
CPU frequency : 1200.000 MHz
Total amount of ram : 7994 MB
Total amount of swap : 7812 MB
System uptime : 46 min,
Download speed from CacheFly: 76.8MB/s
Download speed from Coloat, Atlanta GA: 11.0MB/s
Download speed from Softlayer, Dallas, TX: 14.6MB/s
Download speed from Linode, Tokyo, JP: 7.44MB/s
Download speed from i3d.net, Rotterdam, NL: 64.1MB/s
Download speed from Leaseweb, Haarlem, NL: 55.3MB/s
Download speed from Softlayer, Singapore: 8.20MB/s
Download speed from Softlayer, Seattle, WA: 15.1MB/s
Download speed from Softlayer, San Jose, CA: 12.3MB/s
Download speed from Softlayer, Washington, DC: 23.9MB/s
I/O speed : 119 MB/s
dd if=/dev/zero of=test bs=64k count=16k conv=fdatasync
16384+0 records in
16384+0 records out
1073741824 bytes (1.1 GB) copied, 2.97863 s, 360 MB/s