I understand it is common practice in this industry to sometimes request additional information from a customer if their order is flagged for additional review or marked as fraud from Maxmind. I've seen providers request identifying information such as a scan of a government issued ID. When you can check and see that the ID looks real, and the information provided matches that on file for the account, generally that is acceptable verification and all is good. Perhaps in that case, the customer simply required additional review for placing the order from a VPN. Some places are stricter than others and may require even more information to match with the ID, it varies from company to company it seems.
Now, what about those where you are unable to read the provided verification documents sent in from the customer? For example, a Chinese order that is placed with suspicious details. If you're unable to read Chinese, it makes it difficult to determine the legitimacy of their verification information that they may provide. In that case, what do you consider proper verification for a suspicious order? Do you allow them to proceed?
This is something that doesn't seem to be documented much, and it'll be interesting to see what providers here do to ensure they're processing only legit orders.
Now, what about those where you are unable to read the provided verification documents sent in from the customer? For example, a Chinese order that is placed with suspicious details. If you're unable to read Chinese, it makes it difficult to determine the legitimacy of their verification information that they may provide. In that case, what do you consider proper verification for a suspicious order? Do you allow them to proceed?
This is something that doesn't seem to be documented much, and it'll be interesting to see what providers here do to ensure they're processing only legit orders.