Search results

Make sure you look at Kloxo-MR, it's a fork of the code done by a fellow in India that does it for a living I think. Francisco

Or not use NFS at all because it's terrible. Why oh why would people want to use NFS when the IOPS are hilariously bad. As for panels, the main ones only support CentOS because RHEL always has long lasting support for their products which means they don't have to worry about some big change...

That's amazing. If spoofing is enabled in Buffalo that's sooooo sketchy. I mean, it'd make sense, it's likely the cisco 3500's don't do ACL's in hardware. Francisco

That's the joke. Francisco

Routing table wasn't a big deal at 512K since anyone worried about a table that big was likely also fine using just a default route anyway. There were a few hosts I know of, liquidweb namely, that got side tracked which looks really bad on them. the 1M mark will cause issues, though, because...

You can already see the results of the run out happening in processing times. Turn around is about a week between replies and if you follow their issuing mailing list, you'll see lots of fairly long listings where they pump out a /16 or two worth of space on a pretty good basis. I'm still...

Oh you bastard I was just about to link that :P https://www.arin.net/policy/proposals/2014_13.html TL;DR - You no longer have to have a minimum of a /20 SWIP'd to you if you're single homed or a minimum of a /23 if you're multihomed. It means anyone that wants IP space can request it. Francisco

The problem is that short of SolusVM tripling the price or something (or forcing a minimum volume per month, OnApp style), they aren't going to swap. I'm not sure if you read VPSB back when SolusVM was passing $_GET to SETUID system(), but there was literally a dozen or so panels that were...

Yep. For domains, some people like paying a single source for all their needs as the time saved from having to deal with multiple vendors is worth the couple bucks. I don't see there being a big price difference between solusvm federation plans and onapp ones. Since it's just pass through...

From the wording above, it looks like users will be able to sell from the federation, I don't see OnApp wanting the cesspool of LE providers mucking up their golden cow. They could always do heavy verification of providers to make sure they hold water and aren't a laughing stalk but then they're...

I think i'm going to disable their use of cpulimit for RSYNC. It's good if you have it limited low but at 100% CPU all it's doing is spamming the CPU more. Francisco

WHY WON'T SOMEONE THINK OF THE SANS?

The IP one is hilarious. When we used Solus we saw it happen all the time when you'd fire 2 provisions at once. It was so bad back then that you'd have 2 VM's provision with the same IP's, but only one of them having the IP bound in SolusVM itself. After a little logging I found out why it...

Oh no no, by all means, bump the price all you want, it makes no difference to me :) I stopped paying for that crap many moons ago. I don't think you know Solus' market very well if you think users are going to be looking to sell onapp resources. Many (read: 51%+) of their users are all budget...

@AnthonySmith made a comment on WHT that while they aren't going to jack the price this very second, it's likely going to go up a little bit at least. Virtualizor might suddenly see this as their chance to really dice up the market but I dunno. I hope their first task is doing a complete...

I've been talking to Richard on/off over the past couple weeks and he mentioned they've been working on fixing all the bugs people reported during their soft launch. Francisco

That plan is normally a special but you can talk to @Aldryic and he'll see what he can do :) Francisco

Actually a /12 disappeared as well. Pool is down to 0.70 when it was 0.73 the day before it happening. If you check the blocks they have, you'll see that a /12 isn't listed. It's possible they removed that fresh /12 from the counts as they're going to chop it up but I dunno. Francisco

[16:06:42] Francisco says: suh [16:06:46] Francisco says: i need your address. [16:06:46] Francisco says: >_> [16:06:47] Francisco says: <_< [16:06:48] Francisco says: >_> [16:10:01] Aldryic says: Suh? <_< [16:10:02] Aldryic says: >_> [16:10:06] Aldryic says: *redacted*...

What the hell. Francisco