Search results

Ahem. Please make sure your anus is strapped firmly into the seat. So after a sit down with Anthony it looks like we're doing a 1:1 SATA->SSD conversion on all plans minus the 128MB's. :3 This means you will not lose half of your space nor your disk addons. We will not be upgrading all nodes...

That's what I'm thinking. Pages were taking quite a while to load so it sounded like a SYN flood was passing through. Francisco

That'll also happen :) We'll do it at the same time whenever a 1G / 2G upgrades to the SSD's. Francisco

I thought these guys closes? Didn't they have to close their US locations a while back and sold them off to some random host? Francisco

SIT. Francisco

Yep. We have a superX that we use in LV for our switching now. It's garbage for layer3 but for layer 2? no sweat. We have most of our blades filled and then a 10gig link from that to the router. We never have issues with it and it's a nice change from the TOR's w/ LACP like we used to have...

I have no idea, I'll go ask CN in a few if there's logs of any floods :) Ip's to get banned at times, though. Check in 10 - 15 minutes. Francisco

It's possible they somehow have more than 10k routes internally? It's also most likely because brocade screws people pretty hard for licensing. OSPF is almost always supported in the base images I think where as BGP always tacks a few grand onto the sticker. Same thing in Junipers. Francisco

Yep they mentioned the OSPF part as well. I always figured they backhauled VLAN's from their main router and bound off up there, instead of appending it to VLAN's at he switch level? Or am I having a brain fart over what OSPF would be useful for? Francisco

It's possible their panel isn't V6 ready. I'm not sure why they'd spend so much time/money developing their new panel and not have V6 support listed. That's such a Solus move to pull. Francisco

Yep. We talked to them about getting some POP's open through-out their locations. It's a good setup, especially if you get CHI for a good price. :) Francisco

Dallas is the odd one. From what was said the bandwidth is with Quadranet where as the racks are directly with...colo4? colo4dallas? Something like that. Francisco

Yep I remember Jon mentioning having a lot of nlayer in SJ. Coloat's inhouse blend is nice so it wouldn't be a bad thing to use. Francisco

Like Cloudrck said, fail2ban has an apache log watcher that will automatically block this :) Francisco

It just leads to wonky routes and possibly wonky speeds if you're on an ISP that's too cheap to pay for ports or unwilling to work out a peering deal (Comcast/Verizon/Rogers/Bell pretty much). 2 different traces to google.com show hops against all 4 upstreams with a latency different from 30ms...

True, multipath is a sweet feature :) But I can't see 4 different ISP's all having the same length route to COLO@. Francisco

Just cereal today :P I usually don't get up until 1PM my time since I'll go to bed at 6AM. Francisco

In a normal BGP setup? Yes. In multipath? Maybe. Normally multipath is used as an alternative to bonding interfaces. You have 40gbit from a single upstream? You'd setup 4 different BGP sessions with them and the packets would multipath between it giving you your 40gbit/sec upstream without the...

Nope. If they have a full table in place formed from all of their upstreams then you'd never see the same hop have different upstreams like we do in this. With multipath you are actually taking multiple default routes and then the switching/routing platform will round robin it. Sometimes...

We're not giving a 1:1 on 256MB/512MB plans with the move to SSD's. Read back and you'll see we mentioned that a customer must sacrifice 50% of their space (or upgrade to a 1GB/2GB) to get moved to SSD's. The 1G's & 2G's keep their allocations since we've been wanting to improve what we...