Search results

How do you figure $20.82/mo on an owned license?  If you only survive a year, it works out like that, but anyone purchasing an owned license will survive longer I should hope. I know I had this discussion with @KuJoe once, when he asked why I still use a leased license after so many years, and...

You watch too much FOX news, have a reliable source for any benefit against terrorism?  The GAO has said they see no benefit, and EFF and the ACLU can't rail against this massive overreach enough.

As an eBay shareholder, I am quite pleased ;)

What is the report telling you? I've never seen a false positive from them, but I am sure they are surely possible The reports are fairly detailed, so unsure what you could be questioning

I've been using BigTim or miTgiB since 1995 online, it has a long history dating back to the time I ran an Undernet server, and just now realized that was 20 years ago, holy crap, I need to go hide under the covers now.

Since this is going to host cPanel, I would say there is no choice other than 64bit since cPanel only offers support if the host node is also 64bit, which I don't know for sure, but would definitely take that bet. Well, that used to be on the system requirements page, but no longer...

https://www.kickstarter.com/projects/1598272670/chip-the-worlds-first-9-computer I thought this was pretty cool, but since I still have no use for a raspberry, I'll take that $9 and go out for lunch  edit - yeah, sorry, thought I read this on reddit, not trying to steal from @TheLinuxBug

If you view my tests, it failed on 2.6.32-042stab104.1 It did work on a node with 2.6.32-042stab106.4 [root@server ~]# cat /proc/cgroups #subsys_name    hierarchy       num_cgroups     enabled cpuset  3       60      1 cpu     3       60      1 cpuacct 3       60      1 devices 4       59    ...

I do not see this working on ksplice patched kernels  [root@e5clt19 ~]# uname -a Linux e5clt19.hostigation.com 2.6.32-042stab081.5 #1 SMP Mon Sep 30 16:52:24 MSK 2013 x86_64 x86_64 x86_64 GNU/Linux [root@e5clt19 ~]# uptrack-uname -a Linux e5clt19.hostigation.com 2.6.32-042stab108.1 #1 SMP Thu...

Yeah, I don't see an after the fact message ever taking hold, but like many colo's demand, an auth form to use a Credit Card I can see coming to use PayPal, and actually think I might add PayPal to the list for Dedicated servers and colo space like I already do for Credit Cards. Now, for long...

This is about the most close minded statement I've seen here in a long while.  Chargebacks with the CC issuer will get you banned from PayPal pretty quick I would imagine, and as for kids and donation, well some of us in the 50+ club use PayPal for everything possible as I do not want credit, I...

That 10% rebate on Bitcoin payments is looking smarter everyday

http://forum.proxmox.com/threads/22035-Jessie-and-3-10-0-OpenVZ-kernel-and-the-future Found this in their forum, seems LXC will replace OpenVZ

After watching forks over knives I really try to avoid eating animal products, but cheese is my devil to avoid, I just love it so much. I turned 51 this year, so I'd really like to keep waking up each morning is my driving factor

root@e3rh01:~# uname -a Linux e3rh01 3.10.0-8-pve #1 SMP Sat Mar 14 14:46:55 CET 2015 x86_64 GNU/Linux root@e3rh01:~#   This kernel does not support OpenVZ yet, but all the nice new KVM features. Now that OpenVZ has been released for RHEL/CentOS 7 I expect proxmox will not be far behind.  ...

Proxmox is on my short list to replace SolusVM, Virtualizor was on that list, but their support makes SolusVM look like the A-Team. In the past 5 years I can't remember needing support for the basic functions of the virtualization, but I have needed support for features that always seems to get...

Proxmox has had this feature for years, it's long past proven.  They run the OpenVZ kernel and then modprobe kvm-[intel|amd] The latest feature from Proxmox is ZFS and Ceph storage for KVM, KVM using DBR for Ceph storage and I have my test going, and it is pretty darn nice. I am getting faster...

Sometimes the whole site seems to sit and spin, but I have noticed the dropdown spin at times as well.  I figure someone got mad or wished to stress test the DDoS protection.

I think you may be misunderstanding this, I do not read this as running KVM inside OpenVZ, but running OpenVZ+KVM on the same node is my takeaway from reading the wiki page.  Virtualizor already has KVM nesting if you choose to enable the feature, and I do agree, why would anyone run KVM inside...