Search results

C'mon with silly comparisons that are meaningless, I am comparing like for like on what is promised. If 1 provider offers me 99.99% uptime for $15 per year and another offers the same but at $7 per month you many deduce that the the monthly option is more likely to be the better option but that...

Actually, a subtle grid over the block with the rocket there would work really well in my view.

128MB VPS's still have a lot of uses.  I have one from Buyvm and another from Minivps for DNS, ok they are hardly big money plans at $15/$20 a year but neither get tickets from me about them, very low maintenance for both sides.  So not all have the same abuse/support loads. If it suits you not...

Fekkin Asians...

I could chew on your meatballs all day...

I disagree.  My expectations are based on what I am promised, not the price I pay. If I am told I will receive 99.9% uptime for $15 a year why should I anticipate or expect less because of what I am paying?  If you tell me because I am "only" paying $15 a year I will only get 85% uptime then...

You don't need to. It's branding.  The name matches the logo quite clearly, so it can be whatever you want.  Your logo does not connect with the name or a tagline, that's the point.  Having said that though it's clean and simple which is good.

To be honest it's good to see, the first one was a disaster and the winner an idiot full of excuses.  Hopefully it will be better handled this time and go to someone with a good plan for development and a solid time frame worked out. Yes it's CC, yes it's in the same locations as so many others...

It's certainly very subjective.  Some will be more tolerant/accepting of spells of downtime, varying ticket response time and so on.  So I suppose the bottom line is that if you are a happy overall with a provider then it's reliable for you.  And that is really what it comes down to, if you are...

From the documents and emails that were released from the CC leak a while back (not the databases) it suggests CC certainly does have a vested interest in HVH.

My take is that IPXCore has been very up and down, I think they acknowledge that themselves.  That said, it's not a pissing contest, if you don't like that someone else lists a provider you have had issues with then it's not the place to start throwing shit at them.  

I have used a lot of VPS providers, not just bought and sat them still, but actually used them for a purpose. On that basis the only ones I would recommend based on performance, reliability and support are : Minivps Buyvm Prometeus Lovevps

It means 123systems would be as well offering everything they have for free, it's all their service is fit for.   Still can't understand why he is still a Mod at WHT.

1. SSH into the node. 2. From / type rm -rf * 3. Type reboot 4.  Ta Da!  All fixed. Then just re-install everything from scratch, wont take long.

Well you should still appreciate the issues it will cause, the first thing people noticed was the difference in disk space, people won't pay you for less of any of the 3 main resources.

*Whoosh* That was common sense flying over and away from you.

Oh dear, he will need to get the begging bowl out again and ask the people that are willing to go out and work to earn money to support getting his "lifestyle" back on track.

Do you see my issue with those two statements? Aldryic has probably guessed right that it's an OVH Kimsufi.  Don't get me wrong I have one myself for backups and a few other non public things. I really don't think you are going to get far doing NAT, you had a post on WHT earlier trying to get...

Pretty much at it's fastest there.

I have 2 APC units, but they simply don't power the pc long enough, even if I cut every possible power saving option to the minimum it lasts about 50 mins. Instead I use 1 for the router/modem to keep the internet running, when I tested it last time it went for 18 hours.  I use the other to...