KVM would be less profitable, in the sense that less people buy it. Not enough is sold for the price compared to OpenVZ. From the numbers I keep hearing, KVM is a minor amount of sales and it's not THAT much more expensive.
The E5 is more consistent / stable since there are many cores to distribute. However in terms of raw performance, the E3 will be faster. It comes down to if you want stable performance or burst performance. E3 with only 4 cores is likely to be more utilized than a dual E5 build.
Cloud Shards' aim is to provide cost-effective, premium and reliable hosting to our clients. We cater to individuals, small businesses and all the way to large enterprises that need cutting-edge solutions.
Use the coupon CSHAL3 to get 30% off. Stacks with quarterly, semi-annual and annual...
Cloud Shards' aim is to provide cost-effective, premium and reliable hosting to our clients. We cater to
individuals, small businesses and all the way to large enterprises that need cutting-edge solutions.
All VPS come with 1 IPv4 Address and 99.9% Uptime SLA.
Hosted on Internap Texas...
Cloud Shards' aim is to provide cost-effective, premium and reliable hosting to our clients. We cater to individuals, small businesses and all the way to large enterprises that need cutting-edge solutions.
Limited Time Promo whilst stocks last! IPv6 Ready!
Intel Xeon E3-1230v3 (3.3Ghz)...
dedicated hosting
dedicated servers
linux servers
los angeles dedicated hosting
los angeles dedicated servers
usa dedicated hosting
usa dedicated servers
windows servers
The Juniper's do support IPv6 though? I don't think that part is the problem. I mean they can always take a default route from 1 carrier even and get IPv6 up IF that was the problem.
It means you do get that much swap. No guarantee on if it's in memory or on disk. They can allocate large vswap, but it will overflow to disk if memory is used up.