bzImage
New Member
In the ass with a rake.Where's that 'Fuck You' button >_>
In the ass with a rake.Where's that 'Fuck You' button >_>
No offense at all... I've only used it a short time and at this point nothing mission critical. If I move forward it would have to be with CPanel + whatever solution for VPS. I think, and just my opinion, that language barrier comes into play a lot there... I see a lot of abrasiveness at times but believe it more culture or translation that anything. I'm not a coder either... Not secure at least. So in the same boat.See... My trust with ZPanel left after the founder/owner stated that he wasn't interested in security (and he expressed that by stating (I don't recall the exact words) "What do you expect from a free software that we donate our time to?"). Now I read over everything the security analyst you're speaking of wrote and from my understanding initially when he asked diplomatically his concerns were basically brushed off as in "I know better and you're wrong" and then immediately "It's a free software, what do you expect". When he pursued it more aggressively that's when the development team (from my perspective) took his concerns more seriously (now the hacking just happened when another individual saw the opportunity).
Maybe they fixed that initial problem, but I still can't trust ZPanel at all. It's not the software but the people I have an issue with (and kind of why I don't have any interests to recommend the software). No offense to you @shawn_ky, just wanted to share my opinions of ZPanel. I do hope they don't have this self-entitled thought of themselves. I mean it's as bad as curtisg showing his code and stating "it's just a small piece anyways, what do you care? It's free work anyways!" when criticism about it's security is made.
Of course, I am also a guy who writes pretty crappy code (can't write secure code to save my life) and should not be allowed near a compiler, so take what I say with a grain of salt.
It's called the "Thank you" button on these forms sir.Where's that 'Fuck You' button >_>
Thanks for all the suggestions folks... even if only a handful were the actual panels I was asking about I suppose I'll just stick with the ol' manual setup for now.
This is a limitation of many home routers, I forgot the specifics but sometimes there's an option in your router settings which you need to enable.Only issue I am having is when I am connected to WIFI I need to use the IP for my NAS, off WIFI the FQDN works fine. Weird.
I tried some iptables suggestions from DD-WRT's forum but no dice. It looks like I'll be moving my NAS to a data center anyways since port 25 is blocked by Comcast.This is a limitation of many home routers, I forgot the specifics but sometimes there's an option in your router settings which you need to enable.
edit: http://serverfault.com/questions/26845/unable-to-connect-on-natted-server-from-a-host-computer-on-the-same-lan-using-pu/26851#26851
But it works fine out of the box with my openwrt router, but I recall I needed to activate some 'triangle-blahblah'-option when I was using the router of my ISP.
The webinterface of my openwrt router shows a zone_lan_prerouting thingy which contains a DNAT rule for each of the forwarded ports, rerouting them to their respective internal ipaddresses. But I can't find them in the terminal, iptables isn't really my thing, but most of the other stuff shows up and it specifically stated that that chain didn't exist. :|I tried some iptables suggestions from DD-WRT's forum but no dice. It looks like I'll be moving my NAS to a data center anyways since port 25 is blocked by Comcast.
Whaaa. I might actually test this one out. Honestly all this talk about moving your services off of Google is fantastic. Although anyone know a nice easy tool to move the individual e-mails as well over to your own solution?Am surprised no one mentioned Zarafa ( http://www.zarafa.com/ )
Its opensource and a drop in exchange replacement ( with outlook support ! ) and comes with collaboration ( active sync support) . the community a.k.a free version doesnt support HA, and outlook support is limited to 3 users.
demo here : https://demo.zarafa.com/webapp/
Am using it for some community projects and for our internal mail server at office ( mail cannot be routed outside the local network and such.. ) and it works perfectly and is adapted by most people without any hiccups.
Easy - http://www.howtoforge.com/how-to-migrate-mailboxes-between-imap-servers-with-imapsyncWhaaa. I might actually test this one out. Honestly all this talk about moving your services off of Google is fantastic. Although anyone know a nice easy tool to move the individual e-mails as well over to your own solution?
My ISP doesn't block port 25. It's that ISP that rhymes with Harder.I tried some iptables suggestions from DD-WRT's forum but no dice. It looks like I'll be moving my NAS to a data center anyways since port 25 is blocked by Comcast.
The webinterface of my openwrt router shows a zone_lan_prerouting thingy which contains a DNAT rule for each of the forwarded ports, rerouting them to their respective internal ipaddresses. But I can't find them in the terminal, iptables isn't really my thing, but most of the other stuff shows up and it specifically stated that that chain didn't exist. :|
Comcast is blocking incoming connections on port 25?? For outgoing you could relay the messages through a small vps on a different port.
Yeah, the older versions worked and installed okay. Couldn't get the new version to install for the life of me on my last try.Anyone tried out Kolab? Seems like a decent solution to me.
I think it's the only solution that doesn't end up causing more grief than it's worth. Least overhead, less to secure after default setup, efficient and rarely fails.Out of curiosity, I gave ISPConfig a try. A quick --purge later, I decided to just stick with a postfix/sasl/dovecot manual setup. Thanks for the suggestions though folks; I did see a few recommendations that look rather interesting for some unrelated project ideas.
Pretty much. I've got everything running smoothly now.. perhaps this weekend I'll put up my deployment layout, and maybe do a couple guides for folks wanting to do the self-host thing as well (contacts/calendar/email/sync/'drive'/etc).I think it's the only solution that doesn't end up causing more grief than it's worth. Least overhead, less to secure after default setup, efficient and rarely fails.