amuck-landowner

FAPVPS 2GB KVM

Marc M.

Phoenix VPS
Verified Provider
Can this mod pop in and confirm then because if this is true then vpsBoard is about to head down the same route as LET.
@ I doubt that it is true becuase none of the mods would really care or lower themselves to such depths. @lv-matt just name that mod and be done with it, no theatrics necessary, this isn't LET.

@fapvps run this command exactly as bellow 7 times inside a VPS and post the commands and results here exactly as they are returned by the system:

dd bs=64k count=64k if=/dev/zero of=test conv=fdatasync

This should give everyone a pretty good idea about the performance. Of course, it's just a suggestion, you don't have to do it if you don't want to or don't have the time to do so. It's perfectly understandable :)
 

fapvps

New Member
Verified Provider
@Marc M.

All Runs:


root@test:~# dd bs=64k count=64k if=/dev/zero of=test conv=fdatasync
65536+0 records in
65536+0 records out
4294967296 bytes (4.3 GB) copied, 28.4296 s, 151 MB/s
root@test:~# dd bs=64k count=64k if=/dev/zero of=test conv=fdatasync
65536+0 records in
65536+0 records out
4294967296 bytes (4.3 GB) copied, 28.43 s, 151 MB/s
root@test:~# dd bs=64k count=64k if=/dev/zero of=test conv=fdatasync
65536+0 records in
65536+0 records out
4294967296 bytes (4.3 GB) copied, 28.6814 s, 150 MB/s
root@test:~# dd bs=64k count=64k if=/dev/zero of=test conv=fdatasync
65536+0 records in
65536+0 records out
4294967296 bytes (4.3 GB) copied, 28.2301 s, 152 MB/s
root@test:~# dd bs=64k count=64k if=/dev/zero of=test conv=fdatasync
65536+0 records in
65536+0 records out
4294967296 bytes (4.3 GB) copied, 28.3573 s, 151 MB/s
root@test:~# dd bs=64k count=64k if=/dev/zero of=test conv=fdatasync
65536+0 records in
65536+0 records out
4294967296 bytes (4.3 GB) copied, 28.304 s, 152 MB/s
root@test:~# dd bs=64k count=64k if=/dev/zero of=test conv=fdatasync
65536+0 records in
65536+0 records out
4294967296 bytes (4.3 GB) copied, 28.4686 s, 151 MB/s


Edit:Removed individual runs.
 
Last edited by a moderator:

Marc M.

Phoenix VPS
Verified Provider
@fapvps I doubt that write back cache is on, or you have software node caching enabled which should be off for best performance. 7200 RPM Raid 10 should get you a neat 200MB/s.
 

jarland

The ocean is digital
@fapvps I doubt that write back cache is on, or you have software node caching enabled which should be off for best performance. 7200 RPM Raid 10 should get you a neat 200MB/s.
I've got 4 RE4's of the same size, speed, and interface on that very same controller and using the test you suggested I get this:

4294967296 bytes (4.3 GB) copied, 31.474 s, 136 MB/s

A more common test used among this crowd is: dd if=/dev/zero of=test bs=64k count=16k conv=fdatasync

To which I get: 1073741824 bytes (1.1 GB) copied, 4.47159 s, 240 MB/s

It's hard to measure by a dd test but it can get extra confusing when everyone is comparing results from different tests.
 

Marc M.

Phoenix VPS
Verified Provider
@jarland you're actually right, I got spoiled by our SSD cached nodes.

@fapvps the "@" doesn't work here, you have to right click and mention someone. What a pain. Anyway, those are actually good numbers. The test can be slightly influenced by the controller cache size but they are good numbers.
 
Last edited by a moderator:

MannDude

Just a dude
vpsBoard Founder
Moderator
Can this mod pop in and confirm then because if this is true then vpsBoard is about to head down the same route as LET.
We were having a personal offsite chat.

He sent me a message randomly saying, "Someone using RAID1 or no raid:" with a link to this thread and I said 'call him out' then. He was either going to be right or wrong, and I wanted to see the truth come to light.

I like FAPVPS, I don't know the owners name but he's in IRC and he seems like a good guy.

For transparency sake, here is the convo:

HHxrIuk.png

As you can see, wasn't much a conversation. Check the time and dates. That entire exchange above was over the course of five days.

A better way to have worded it is "contact him and find out" or something. But yeah, I said it. As the convo shows there was no grand conspiracy. A simple / quick exchange of words and then I went back to whatever it was that I was doing.
 
Last edited by a moderator:

fapvps

New Member
Verified Provider
MegaCli -PDList -aALL


Adapter #0

Enclosure Device ID: 252
Slot Number: 0
Drive's position: DiskGroup: 0, Span: 0, Arm: 0
Enclosure position: N/A
Device Id: 12
WWN: 5000C5005592BAA4
Sequence Number: 2
Media Error Count: 0
Other Error Count: 0
Predictive Failure Count: 0
Last Predictive Failure Event Seq Number: 0
PD Type: SAS

Raw Size: 931.512 GB [0x74706db0 Sectors]
Non Coerced Size: 931.012 GB [0x74606db0 Sectors]
Coerced Size: 930.390 GB [0x744c8000 Sectors]
Sector Size: 0
Firmware state: Online, Spun Up
Commissioned Spare : No
Emergency Spare : No
Device Firmware Level: 0002
Shield Counter: 0
Successful diagnostics completion on : N/A
SAS Address(0): 0x5000c5005592baa5
SAS Address(1): 0x0
Connected Port Number: 1(path0)
Inquiry Data: SEAGATE ST1000NM0001 0002Z1N2XA1E
FDE Capable: Not Capable
FDE Enable: Disable
Secured: Unsecured
Locked: Unlocked
Needs EKM Attention: No
Foreign State: None
Device Speed: 6.0Gb/s
Link Speed: 6.0Gb/s
Media Type: Hard Disk Device
Drive: Not Certified
Drive Temperature :34C (93.20 F)
PI Eligibility: No
Drive is formatted for PI information: No
PI: No PI
Port-0 :
Port status: Active
Port's Linkspeed: 6.0Gb/s
Port-1 :
Port status: Active
Port's Linkspeed: Unknown
Drive has flagged a S.M.A.R.T alert : No



Enclosure Device ID: 252
Slot Number: 1
Drive's position: DiskGroup: 0, Span: 0, Arm: 1
Enclosure position: N/A
Device Id: 11
WWN: 5000C5005592B544
Sequence Number: 2
Media Error Count: 0
Other Error Count: 0
Predictive Failure Count: 0
Last Predictive Failure Event Seq Number: 0
PD Type: SAS

Raw Size: 931.512 GB [0x74706db0 Sectors]
Non Coerced Size: 931.012 GB [0x74606db0 Sectors]
Coerced Size: 930.390 GB [0x744c8000 Sectors]
Sector Size: 0
Firmware state: Online, Spun Up
Commissioned Spare : No
Emergency Spare : No
Device Firmware Level: 0002
Shield Counter: 0
Successful diagnostics completion on : N/A
SAS Address(0): 0x5000c5005592b545
SAS Address(1): 0x0
Connected Port Number: 2(path0)
Inquiry Data: SEAGATE ST1000NM0001 0002Z1N2XA58
FDE Capable: Not Capable
FDE Enable: Disable
Secured: Unsecured
Locked: Unlocked
Needs EKM Attention: No
Foreign State: None
Device Speed: 6.0Gb/s
Link Speed: 6.0Gb/s
Media Type: Hard Disk Device
Drive: Not Certified
Drive Temperature :33C (91.40 F)
PI Eligibility: No
Drive is formatted for PI information: No
PI: No PI
Port-0 :
Port status: Active
Port's Linkspeed: 6.0Gb/s
Port-1 :
Port status: Active
Port's Linkspeed: Unknown
Drive has flagged a S.M.A.R.T alert : No



Enclosure Device ID: 252
Slot Number: 2
Drive's position: DiskGroup: 0, Span: 1, Arm: 0
Enclosure position: N/A
Device Id: 10
WWN: 5000C5005592F678
Sequence Number: 2
Media Error Count: 0
Other Error Count: 0
Predictive Failure Count: 0
Last Predictive Failure Event Seq Number: 0
PD Type: SAS

Raw Size: 931.512 GB [0x74706db0 Sectors]
Non Coerced Size: 931.012 GB [0x74606db0 Sectors]
Coerced Size: 930.390 GB [0x744c8000 Sectors]
Sector Size: 0
Firmware state: Online, Spun Up
Commissioned Spare : No
Emergency Spare : No
Device Firmware Level: 0002
Shield Counter: 0
Successful diagnostics completion on : N/A
SAS Address(0): 0x5000c5005592f679
SAS Address(1): 0x0
Connected Port Number: 3(path0)
Inquiry Data: SEAGATE ST1000NM0001 0002Z1N2X93R
FDE Capable: Not Capable
FDE Enable: Disable
Secured: Unsecured
Locked: Unlocked
Needs EKM Attention: No
Foreign State: None
Device Speed: 6.0Gb/s
Link Speed: 6.0Gb/s
Media Type: Hard Disk Device
Drive: Not Certified
Drive Temperature :34C (93.20 F)
PI Eligibility: No
Drive is formatted for PI information: No
PI: No PI
Port-0 :
Port status: Active
Port's Linkspeed: 6.0Gb/s
Port-1 :
Port status: Active
Port's Linkspeed: Unknown
Drive has flagged a S.M.A.R.T alert : No



Enclosure Device ID: 252
Slot Number: 3
Drive's position: DiskGroup: 0, Span: 1, Arm: 1
Enclosure position: N/A
Device Id: 9
WWN: 5000C5005592B2A8
Sequence Number: 2
Media Error Count: 0
Other Error Count: 0
Predictive Failure Count: 0
Last Predictive Failure Event Seq Number: 0
PD Type: SAS

Raw Size: 931.512 GB [0x74706db0 Sectors]
Non Coerced Size: 931.012 GB [0x74606db0 Sectors]
Coerced Size: 930.390 GB [0x744c8000 Sectors]
Sector Size: 0
Firmware state: Online, Spun Up
Commissioned Spare : No
Emergency Spare : No
Device Firmware Level: 0002
Shield Counter: 0
Successful diagnostics completion on : N/A
SAS Address(0): 0x5000c5005592b2a9
SAS Address(1): 0x0
Connected Port Number: 0(path0)
Inquiry Data: SEAGATE ST1000NM0001 0002Z1N2XA8E
FDE Capable: Not Capable
FDE Enable: Disable
Secured: Unsecured
Locked: Unlocked
Needs EKM Attention: No
Foreign State: None
Device Speed: 6.0Gb/s
Link Speed: 6.0Gb/s
Media Type: Hard Disk Device
Drive: Not Certified
Drive Temperature :36C (96.80 F)
PI Eligibility: No
Drive is formatted for PI information: No
PI: No PI
Port-0 :
Port status: Active
Port's Linkspeed: 6.0Gb/s
Port-1 :
Port status: Active
Port's Linkspeed: Unknown
Drive has flagged a S.M.A.R.T alert : No




Exit Code: 0x00

MegaCli64 -LDInfo -Lall -aALL


Adapter 0 -- Virtual Drive Information:
Virtual Drive: 0 (Target Id: 0)
Name :
RAID Level : Primary-1, Secondary-0, RAID Level Qualifier-0
Size : 1.816 TB
Sector Size : 512
Mirror Data : 1.816 TB
State : Optimal
Strip Size : 1.0 MB
Number Of Drives per span:2
Span Depth : 2
Default Cache Policy: WriteBack, ReadAheadNone, Direct, No Write Cache if Bad BBU
Current Cache Policy: WriteBack, ReadAheadNone, Direct, No Write Cache if Bad BBU
Default Access Policy: Read/Write
Current Access Policy: Read/Write
Disk Cache Policy : Disabled
Encryption Type : None
Is VD Cached: No



Exit Code: 0x00

MegaCli -AdpBbuCmd -aAll


BBU status for Adapter: 0

BatteryType: iBBU08
Voltage: 3980 mV
Current: 0 mA
Temperature: 38 C
Battery State: Optimal
Design Mode : 12+ Hrs retention with a transparent learn cycle and best service life.

BBU Firmware Status:

Charging Status : None
Voltage : OK
Temperature : OK
Learn Cycle Requested : No
Learn Cycle Active : No
Learn Cycle Status : OK
Learn Cycle Timeout : No
I2c Errors Detected : No
Battery Pack Missing : No
Battery Replacement required : No
Remaining Capacity Low : No
Periodic Learn Required : No
Transparent Learn : No
No space to cache offload : No
Pack is about to fail & should be replaced : No
Cache Offload premium feature required : No
Module microcode update required : No

BBU GasGauge Status: 0x0180
Relative State of Charge: 84 %
Charger System State: 1
Charger System Ctrl: 0
Charging current: 0 mA
Absolute state of charge: 80 %
Max Error: 0 %
Battery backup charge time : 48 hours +

BBU Capacity Info for Adapter: 0

Relative State of Charge: 84 %
Absolute State of charge: 80 %
Remaining Capacity: 1206 mAh
Full Charge Capacity: 1437 mAh
Run time to empty: Battery is not being charged.
Average time to empty: 2 Hour, 25 Min.
Estimated Time to full recharge: Battery is not being charged.
Cycle Count: 3

BBU Design Info for Adapter: 0

Date of Manufacture: 10/26, 2012
Design Capacity: 1500 mAh
Design Voltage: 4100 mV
Specification Info: 0
Serial Number: 21115
Pack Stat Configuration: 0x0000
Manufacture Name: LS36691
Firmware Version :
Device Name: bq27541
Device Chemistry: LION
Battery FRU: N/A
Transparent Learn = 1
App Data = 0

BBU Properties for Adapter: 0

Auto Learn Period: 28 Days
Next Learn time: None Learn Delay Interval:0 Hours
Auto-Learn Mode: Disabled
BBU Mode = 1

Exit Code: 0x00

I'm not sure what else to paste...
 

Marc M.

Phoenix VPS
Verified Provider
@fapvps oh hell, it was clarified yesterday that everything you posted was legit. Your benchmarks and everything else that you have posted are legit, very much so. Just my opinion: I think that allot of people are giving you a hard time because of your business name, and because how you are advertising with it (I'm referring to your offer on LET). We re-branded 3 times before we have found a name that worked for us (and was also available). There is no hard in changing your name and going with something else. Please take this as just my personal opinion.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Top
amuck-landowner