The worst thing about all of this is the way the customers have been treated.
Within the escalation department (Which I created and ran) tickets went from around a 6 hour turn around and 20 tickets open at anyone time, to a 2 week turn around and over 1500 tickets open!
Long and short is EIG couldn't continue to bleed money, the accusations were to boost revenue figures. When that didn't wash any further with the board (or just before if they caught wind of it) it started being more about maximizing efficiencies, this means getting rid of sources of expenses (Servers = migrations, Staff = sack them, Datacentre space = consolidate resources). I found the staff members they consulted with were the wrong ones, they were people who quickly brown nosed, said what they thought EIG wanted to hear and really needed to keep their jobs more than doing or saying the right thing. The head of support was marked as a troublemaker for sticking to his guns, personally as the head of escalations (a department that they are taking forward into EIG as a whole) I was talked to once and never again.
So you've got a company needing to start showing profits, taking advice from people who care only about themselves, being merged into a larger company that's always in flux and doesn't have a set strategy for the future (or if it does it is nothing to do with happy customers).
Within the escalation department (Which I created and ran) tickets went from around a 6 hour turn around and 20 tickets open at anyone time, to a 2 week turn around and over 1500 tickets open!
Long and short is EIG couldn't continue to bleed money, the accusations were to boost revenue figures. When that didn't wash any further with the board (or just before if they caught wind of it) it started being more about maximizing efficiencies, this means getting rid of sources of expenses (Servers = migrations, Staff = sack them, Datacentre space = consolidate resources). I found the staff members they consulted with were the wrong ones, they were people who quickly brown nosed, said what they thought EIG wanted to hear and really needed to keep their jobs more than doing or saying the right thing. The head of support was marked as a troublemaker for sticking to his guns, personally as the head of escalations (a department that they are taking forward into EIG as a whole) I was talked to once and never again.
So you've got a company needing to start showing profits, taking advice from people who care only about themselves, being merged into a larger company that's always in flux and doesn't have a set strategy for the future (or if it does it is nothing to do with happy customers).