amuck-landowner

Looking for a cheap yearly VPS with IPv6 and peers with HE and Cogent

KuJoe

Well-Known Member
Verified Provider
Looking for a cheap yearly VPS hosted in any other data center with HE + Cogent for IPv4 and IPv6 (so far I could only find Joe's Data Center in my limited search). Any specs will do as long as it has IPv4, native IPv6, and peers with Cogent and HE for both.

Budget is $30/year but this is flexible. Thanks!
 

zzrok

New Member
Are you looking for something that is Cogent + HE only, or can other providers also be in the mix?  It will be difficult to find anyone else exclusively using Cogent + HE.  Also, most network mixes I watch are changing all the time, so you might not be on the same mix a year after you sign up.
 

HalfEatenPie

The Irrational One
Retired Staff
Hm...

I've seen many people have HE or Cogent but not both. 

WSI has Cogent and HE but only on IPv6 (IPv4 is HE only).  
 

KuJoe

Well-Known Member
Verified Provider
It can have other upstreams but they must use HE + Cogent for IPv6. I understand data centers can change upstreams and I'm fine with switching providers later on. :)
 

fizzyjoe908

New Member
Verified Provider
We can provide this in Phoenix, AZ (AS30693) with either OpenVZ or KVM. Your budget shouldn't be an issue though I don't know what more you're looking for in terms of the other VPS specifications.

If you're interested, let me know!

URL: https://vapornode.com/cloud
 

sv01

Slow but sure
Do you have a test IPv6 address I can check out? Thanks.
from LEB offer


2607:ff50:0:28:7409:909a:1645:7b0f
traceroute from DO SG via HE

Code:
 4  xe-5-1-0.sin11.ip6.gtt.net (2001:668:0:3::1020:2e1)  1.707 ms if-ae7.2.tcore1.SVQ-Singapore.ipv6.as6453.net (2405:2000:300::5)  25.652 ms xe-5-1-0.sin11.ip6.gtt.net (2001:668:0:3::1020:2e1)  1.696 ms
 5  ge2-4.core1.sin1.he.net (2400:7a00:0:a22::1)  1.820 ms xe-5-1-0.sin11.ip6.gtt.net (2001:668:0:3::1020:2e1)  1.644 ms ge2-4.core1.sin1.he.net (2400:7a00:0:a22::1)  1.779 ms
 6  10ge6-1.core1.hkg1.he.net (2001:470:0:29f::1)  32.798 ms  40.067 ms  32.536 ms
 7  10ge3-1.core1.tyo1.he.net (2001:470:0:26a::1)  97.417 ms  97.413 ms  97.376 ms
 8  10ge15-2.core1.lax2.he.net (2001:470:0:294::1)  191.763 ms *  189.457 ms
 9  10ge14-1.core1.den1.he.net (2001:470:0:15d::1)  215.776 ms *  215.691 ms
10  10ge4-3.core1.chi1.he.net (2001:470:0:1af::1)  241.063 ms *  241.155 ms
11  continuum-data-centers-llc.gigabitethernet11-18.core1.chi1.he.net (2001:470:1:3e7::2)  381.873 ms *  381.757 ms
12  * * *
13  * * *
14  * * *
15  * * *
16  atrato-gw.ip6.gtt.net (2001:668:0:3::8000:be2)  3360.535 ms !H * *
 
Last edited by a moderator:

fizzyjoe908

New Member
Verified Provider
The IPv6 test by @sv01 is for Chicago and only applicable to our dedicated servers.

Our Phoenix (VPS) IPv6 test is 2607:ff28:0:21::f2

Our Phoenix (VPS) IPv4 test is 104.140.67.17
 

KuJoe

Well-Known Member
Verified Provider
Our Phoenix (VPS) IPv6 test is 2607:ff28:0:21::f2
I'm seeing 100% packet loss from Tampa, Chicago, Dallas, and Denver. Looks like it's not reachable for TeliaSonera (Tampa and Denver) and I'm getting blocked by 2607:ff28:7001:c::2 for Dallas and Chicago. It's weird because our Tampa locations peers with Cogent and our Denver location peers with HE so why they are going over TeliaSonera is just strange. Maybe I'll need to find a provider with Level3 in the mix just to be safe since Cogent and HE have weird routing sometimes.
 

fizzyjoe908

New Member
Verified Provider
I'm seeing 100% packet loss from Tampa, Chicago, Dallas, and Denver. Looks like it's not reachable for TeliaSonera (Tampa and Denver) and I'm getting blocked by 2607:ff28:7001:c::2 for Dallas and Chicago. It's weird because our Tampa locations peers with Cogent and our Denver location peers with HE so why they are going over TeliaSonera is just strange. Maybe I'll need to find a provider with Level3 in the mix just to be safe since Cogent and HE have weird routing sometimes.
I noticed this last night too. The IP can only reach certain destinations. I have passed this information on to our datacenter so this should hopefully be resolved soon.
 

KuJoe

Well-Known Member
Verified Provider
I'm wondering if there's a bigger issue, I'm noticing some routing issues over IPv6 for other test IPs I've been trying in different locations even going over Level3. I've opened a ticket with one of my data centers also to see if they can figure out what's going on and hopefully escalate it to the proper networks.
 

lowesthost

Member
Verified Provider
its because cogent will not play nice

http://www.datacenterknowledge.com/archives/2009/10/22/peering-disputes-migrate-to-ipv6/

its going to keep happening

probably you are right need all 3  cogent, he and level 3   or another peer that peers with  both he & cogent

I've opened a ticket with one of my data centers also to see if they can figure out what's going on and hopefully escalate it to the proper networks.
if they are dealing with he.net cogent   cogent will  do nothing

we have he.net & cogent ipv6  ( just not in the same place)   and they cant talk to each other
 
Last edited by a moderator:

KuJoe

Well-Known Member
Verified Provider
its because cogent will not play nice

http://www.datacenterknowledge.com/archives/2009/10/22/peering-disputes-migrate-to-ipv6/

its going to keep happening

probably you are right need all 3  cogent, he and level 3   or another peer that peers with  both he & cogent

if they are dealing with he.net cogent   cogent will  do nothing

we have he.net & cogent ipv6  ( just not in the same place)   and they cant talk to each other
I know that, that's why I asked for both in my first post. ;) The connectivity issues we're experiencing are not related to that.
 

AnthonySmith

New Member
Verified Provider
I wonder what the real reason is Cogent do this, is there not some sort of petition that can be sent to an ombudsman to force them in to doing something?
 

Enterprisevpssolutions

Article Submitter
Verified Provider
We use both ipv6 and ipv4 with the following providers XO, Level 3, TWTC, GTT, NTT, Cogent, Comcast and Global Crossing. ipv6 is dhcp setup to your server we allow you to choose which ipv6 resolvers you want to use we let our clients know of Google Public DNS IPv6 addresses which are as follows:2001:4860:4860::8888 & 2001:4860:4860::8844. We still have some finishing work to do on our switch out of our previous billing system. But all in all we have ipv4 and ipv6 for dedicated server, shared hosting, VPS and Private Cloud systems. IPV6 is the way as ipv4 is hard to get from arin. 
 

KuJoe

Well-Known Member
Verified Provider
We use both ipv6 and ipv4 with the following providers XO, Level 3, TWTC, GTT, NTT, Cogent, Comcast and Global Crossing. ipv6 is dhcp setup to your server we allow you to choose which ipv6 resolvers you want to use we let our clients know of Google Public DNS IPv6 addresses which are as follows:2001:4860:4860::8888 & 2001:4860:4860::8844. We still have some finishing work to do on our switch out of our previous billing system. But all in all we have ipv4 and ipv6 for dedicated server, shared hosting, VPS and Private Cloud systems. IPV6 is the way as ipv4 is hard to get from arin.
Did you forget to include HE in your list? I'm pretty sure I made it a requirement in my post and the thread title.
 

Mid

New Member
I am just a lay man regarding hosting but, 

From afterburst.com/datacenters (miami) :

IPv4: 96.47.231.200

IPv6: 2607:ff48:1:300::4c4:5b70

But afterburst doesn't seem to have any $30/y vps.

The dc is QuadraNet ( bgp.he.net/AS8100 )

and their InfraCloud service starts from $5.81/m

ps: I think you have used/using QuadraNet for your aFreeCloud 

ps: strange to see a provider searching for a low end vps (instead of people like me) 
 

KuJoe

Well-Known Member
Verified Provider
@Mid most of the time I'm looking for LEBs for myself personally and not for my company but in this case I'm looking for anothet monitoring VPS (I like to keep my monitoring VPSs outside of our networks to see what clients see) and LEBs are perfect for that. :)
 

Mid

New Member
sorry for the mistake, I thought you were overlooking quadranet

on you initial post you didn't mention quadranet (just said 'any other dc')
 
Top
amuck-landowner