amuck-landowner

Looking for a cheap yearly VPS with IPv6 and peers with HE and Cogent

KuJoe

Well-Known Member
Verified Provider
@Mid I have servers with QuadraNet already and have a monitoring VPs with them also. ;) Thanks for the suggestion though.
 
Last edited by a moderator:

Mid

New Member
AS1299  -  TeliaSonera

AS30693 --> Eonix.net --> serverhub.com ; has $15/y , $32/y plans but can't find a test ip, let you contact

PS: 

30693 is the one used on the vpsB library article "How to gauge the quality of a provider's network"

but I noticed it only after I found it via random searching :(

anyhow, you all missed it :)
 

Mid

New Member
On my random test, I also noticed cloudshards , but it doesn't have cogent+HE on ipv6 if I saw it right (AS62638 - cogent missing on ipv6)
 

Wintereise

New Member
On my random test, I also noticed cloudshards , but it doesn't have cogent+HE on ipv6 if I saw it right (AS62638 - cogent missing on ipv6)
It is not. PCCW and HE are simply too well peered for IPv6, not a lot flows inbound via Cogent.

It's there if needed, though.

From the Cogent looking glass for one of the LA blocks,

Code:
BGP routing table entry for 2602:FFE8:300::/40, version 110148281
Paths: (1 available, best #1, table Default)
62638
2001:550:0:1000::421C:127 (metric 10166061) from 2001:550:0:1000::9A36:424C (154.54.66.76)
Origin IGP, localpref 130, valid, internal, best
Community: 174:3001 174:10017 174:20999 174:21001 174:22013
Originator: 66.28.1.39, Cluster list: 154.54.66.76, 66.28.1.69, 66.28.1.103, 66.28.1.9, 66.28.1.68
 

Kenshin

Member
Verified Provider
I don't have good networking knowledge, but I didn't see 'cogent' on ipv6 for AS62638

HE+cogent on both v4 & v6 is the requirement

image link below: (could not attach image, dialog doesn't close)

http://s11.postimg.org/vrkq1u1dv/as62638.png
Not appearing on the IPv6 peer list doesn't mean they don't have Cogent. HE relies on BGP table feeds from other networks to build their data, and they just don't happen to have a BGP feed from someone that has primarily Cogent on IPv6, which is understandable since I'd say every other network relies on HE for IPv6.

You can either use Cogent's looking glass to confirm as Wintereise posted, or pretty much assume that if someone has Cogent for transit in IPv4, they'd have Cogent in IPv6 as well.
 
Top
amuck-landowner