LowEndTalk/LowEndBox Gets a New Manager

[mpkossen]

Admittedly I'm a little curious if that relationship is headed south.

Can't say it's unexpected.

MY SITES HAVE PRIVACY POLICIES

You're talking about LET and Privacy Policies in the same thread... Dude! You of all people should know better.

 

[HN-Matt]

PRIVACY POLICIES

I'm not one to defend LET, but at least they don't bother with the farce that is SSL. Let's Encrypt's favicon says it all.

 

[mpkossen]

I'm not one to defend LET, but at least they don't bother with the farce that is SSL. Let's Encrypt's favicon says it all.

I guess you triggered something with your comment ;-)

 

[AuroraZero]

I guess you triggered something with your comment ;-)

He must have, I really thought it would be a cold day in hell when they did it. They proved me wrong me though. Hell, MI is a balmy 28 Fahrenheit / -2 Celsius. 

 

[HN-Matt]

Unsure if I should attempt a 'Tales from the Cryptkeeper' joke at this juncture.

 

[mpkossen]

He must have, I really thought it would be a cold day in hell when they did it. They proved me wrong me though. Hell, MI is a balmy 28 Fahrenheit / -2 Celsius. 

I'm positively surprised as well. Curious at the same time as to why they didn't do it before. The argument used to be that it would be harder to prevent DDoS attacks with SSL enabled.


Next step is fixing the 'Not Secure' warning. Not sure how much Google likes that.

 

[AuroraZero]

I'm positively surprised as well. Curious at the same time as to why they didn't do it before. The argument used to be that it would be harder to prevent DDoS attacks with SSL enabled.


Next step is fixing the 'Not Secure' warning. Not sure how much Google likes that.

Vivaldi hates it with a passion. No green lock here. So I would assume it would be the same for chrome. Not saying google would penalize them for it, but I would not look to favorably at it myself.