This has nothing to do with prometeus, as i said, this is from Before I even had a prometeus VM, not to mention working for him.
It started when BuyVM tried to justify the banning of an app which posed 0 risks (relay nodes) or surcharging it later because there was a moral problem with alloing child rapists to use their services. If they had that concern should have closed shop, cp is all over the net. As a Tor nodes operator I took offense in being called that and was also struck by the violence of this uncalled attack and had a hunch there must be something else behind these attacks.
It started this way but could have been stopped there if Aldryic stopped the attacks, but he intensiffied them the closest I got to the truth, with banning me at the end.
Of course, I am not happy with this, being the constant punch bag of aldryic which breaks written and unwritten rules of forums and this is very frustrating when everyone approves that behaviour because it is for a good cause and he i one of the good guys, our guys against the big bad mao out there. Even Prometeus becomes bad because hires such a monster.
Sure, even hacking threats are ok, because, again, it is for a good cause.
How BuyVM managed to keep all those skeletons in the closet for so long without being called for it, is simple, declare everyone a personal enemy and try to prove they are biased. It is also possible that other providers were threatened with hacks and they decided to stay away of the wasp nest, lacking the balls to call it as it is. We all know Francico has deep solus knowledge from the illegal manipulation of the code (for one, decoding it is illegal, not to mention reusing parts of it in their products, but who cares about that solus are the bad guys, BuyVM the good guys).
Then it is the case of them running OVZ inside KVM, the problems with all the DCs so far (except the last one, of course, those are much better than everything else, DCs must be crazy to do business with them anymore, but that is their loss), the lies (until I managed to PROVE their network sucks, it was the best in the world, you know), then it was the DC, even though the claims were easily proven false using basic math. BuyVM can do no wrong, Mao is the bad one here, CC, EGI, LET, even Salvatore now and everyone touched by them. We have only San Francisco and San Aldryic, part of the evangelical church of BuyVM. Their PR is good, no doubt about it, they still have some followers ready to take the worse deal because it comes from then and drop the good one because they dont like Mao, but that following is shrinking every day, the BuyVM quality does not resist scrutiny, the only way they can keep the illusion is by bullying people to shut up so nobody actually checks it or compare with similar, cheaper and better offers.
I dare evryone to do some speed tests, compare BuyVM with the really bad CVPS, for example, we will see who stands better, the dears of these forums or the bad competition.
It started when BuyVM tried to justify the banning of an app which posed 0 risks (relay nodes) or surcharging it later because there was a moral problem with alloing child rapists to use their services. If they had that concern should have closed shop, cp is all over the net. As a Tor nodes operator I took offense in being called that and was also struck by the violence of this uncalled attack and had a hunch there must be something else behind these attacks.
It started this way but could have been stopped there if Aldryic stopped the attacks, but he intensiffied them the closest I got to the truth, with banning me at the end.
Of course, I am not happy with this, being the constant punch bag of aldryic which breaks written and unwritten rules of forums and this is very frustrating when everyone approves that behaviour because it is for a good cause and he i one of the good guys, our guys against the big bad mao out there. Even Prometeus becomes bad because hires such a monster.
Sure, even hacking threats are ok, because, again, it is for a good cause.
How BuyVM managed to keep all those skeletons in the closet for so long without being called for it, is simple, declare everyone a personal enemy and try to prove they are biased. It is also possible that other providers were threatened with hacks and they decided to stay away of the wasp nest, lacking the balls to call it as it is. We all know Francico has deep solus knowledge from the illegal manipulation of the code (for one, decoding it is illegal, not to mention reusing parts of it in their products, but who cares about that solus are the bad guys, BuyVM the good guys).
Then it is the case of them running OVZ inside KVM, the problems with all the DCs so far (except the last one, of course, those are much better than everything else, DCs must be crazy to do business with them anymore, but that is their loss), the lies (until I managed to PROVE their network sucks, it was the best in the world, you know), then it was the DC, even though the claims were easily proven false using basic math. BuyVM can do no wrong, Mao is the bad one here, CC, EGI, LET, even Salvatore now and everyone touched by them. We have only San Francisco and San Aldryic, part of the evangelical church of BuyVM. Their PR is good, no doubt about it, they still have some followers ready to take the worse deal because it comes from then and drop the good one because they dont like Mao, but that following is shrinking every day, the BuyVM quality does not resist scrutiny, the only way they can keep the illusion is by bullying people to shut up so nobody actually checks it or compare with similar, cheaper and better offers.
I dare evryone to do some speed tests, compare BuyVM with the really bad CVPS, for example, we will see who stands better, the dears of these forums or the bad competition.
