newer brands are pretty much forced to jump in at 2GB for ~$5 on E3's.
NO! WRONG! These child hosts aren't 'brands' or businesses. Where is the uniqueness of selling same old OpenVZ + Solus on a beat network on an E3 with 32GB of RAM while selling 2GB plans? In other industries we call something like this fraud and an inevitable failure. Spare me the hosting oversell ratio stuff. I know, I was talking about that when a good number of you were in diapers.
No one forces anyone to jump on the sinking $7 ship.
Very few of them had solid business plans and some of the ones that did weren't even in the top 3 picks
Referring to the old site and their TWO very flawed and failed giveaway promotions, where a prize was never issued. Ho hum, that's not legal either. Someone over there should know better since a gaming giveaway years prior ended in a lawsuit against CC. Just saying...
I read the most recent contest applications and they were HORRID. Not a single person should have been given anything. There was maybe 1 or 2 that had some potential and that was very minor potential. Nothing among the heap was commercially viable.
So...
I'd view the biggest pain today for a would-be provider being developing a niche and identifying a market / customer base without bending over and getting mugged with the last hope 'business' model of the low end. This means real pricing, real resources sold and able to be used by customers and frankly, something more than just ping and power.
Some already developed concepts that stand out:
1. Storage VPS --- Backupsy
2. Protected network - BuyVM
3. Cloud - ???