Search results

  .... I couldn't resist that one, sorry  :D

WARNING:  _NEVER_ under any circumstance run untested code on your production deployments.  WHMCS will issue you a development license if requested:  _ALWAYS_ test unknown code in a development environment before use on production servers. Those of you running WHMCS know that you can view the...

In theory, such a setup sounds like a decent idea.  But after reading some of the 'provider commentary'... I'd be wary on trusting reports at all.  Demi works well enough for our anti-fraud; we'll just stick with her.

  Considered that as well... but then we'd be taking on a whole new fulltime job of having to do updates/etc -_-;

Don't hate the company based on the words of others.  But be VERY well aware of some of the shady practices from some of their employees that have come to light, and decide for yourself whether their actions are sufficient to blunt your trust.

You're not making a very good impression of your own company by trying to drag personal grievances into a public forum, rather than just settling things with him privately. Just a small bit of advice from someone who has witnessed the consequences of the path you're taking.

... fantastic, starting to feel like LET already >_<

While very true, it would be rather counter-productive, as the primary reason we're doing the panel is to break free of the "low end" mold.  :P  We'd briefly discussed releasing a public version of S2 (without the new features we're adding).. but that would honestly just be too much extra work...

  Quite possible with a little bit of SQL tweaking (simply adding a table, or adjusting the tblclients depending on how you wanted to tier it), and editing the administration .tpl for viewing a client's profile.

You wouldn't like me when I'm... sober. :ph34r:

We did VMWare back with the Frantech brand.  Would be good for a smaller company specializing in managed services... but if you like automation or easy fixes for clients, not a good thing -_-

The router disagrees with you, suh :P

Size was irrelevant in this case.  RUDY floods are nasty, and require manually parsing/setting filters.

I'll attempt to be less subtle with my sarcasm.  The point is, having a contrived 'justification' doesn't actually negate the action taking place.

Nah, it's the PHP that can't keep up now.  The community went from small to OSHIT in a couple of hours <_< It's being looked into now.

You're partially correct.  There was (and still is) a booter hitting the site's IP - it just took me a few minutes to get it properly filtered; hence the slow load times earlier.

Correct... took me a bit to get it filtered, sorry about that.  Looks like someone's got a bad case of the butthurt <_<

17, actually :P  @bfj is currently in 6th place for number of active services with us, with 5th-1st being 22, 23, 28, 31, and 36 active services, respectively.

I seriously hope you're not implying that we have anything to do with this mess?