Search results

Very happy to be partaking in a friendly community again ^_^

1) It's not my permission to give.   2) We've already publicly answered this accusation multiple times. Present your proof, or take a hike.  But no, we'll not waste time with your pointless accommodations... especially after the stunts your boss Alex pulled with the questions we asked him.  To...

And if Biloh actually let you do this, there would be a lawsuit on his ass just as quick as can be.  The burden of proof falls to the accuser - if you have nothing substantial to offer, then I do believe it's time you move on to the next lie. 

Mmm, several can attest against that statement.  But, I do respect your desire to be excluded from my playfulness, and you won't have to worry about any more of that coming your way from me anymore. 

Teaching by example, sir :3  But to be blunt - if you honestly take that as anything more than a playful jab with no real insult behind it, just let me know.  So far I'm under the impression that we're having a bit of good natured fun, a little relief from the oh-so-serious internets. :P

If you honestly have to ask that, then you don't know Fran or myself at all. I agree completely, it's just as silly and nonsensical a misinterpretation as claiming CVPS and ColoCrossing are the same entity.  Take that how you want, since the fact remains we use nested virtualization on only a...

But, you have a very firm grasp of the obvious, so you're doing just fine ^_^

Prove it :3  Except... that's right, you can't.  The best you can manage is trying to misinterpret a single line from a chat log :P

Well, if you did, wouldn't that make you a candidate for the Jeiber thing? :P

Phenomenal.  You would think after complete disregard and avoidance, that he might take the hint. >_<

"That person from the LET chat" was him, Mun.  The skype log I posted there is the same one I linked earlier in this thread.  We also clarified his confusion on that thread as well - the choice of not believing is his.  And honestly, given his very well known history of blatant lies, is irrelevant.

If you wish to twist words to make a "truth"... well, we've already made our public statement.  And attempting to base your entire arguement over "He said something that might be considered admittance" just makes you look... well, foolish, to be honest.

Which ties back into #1... seeing as none of us at BuyVM went around telling folks that we used nested virtualization? O_o  It'd be a cop-out, but he could very easily just tell us that he did infact hear it from an unreliable secondhand source.  But.. I feel he may rather persist in insisting...

... if there's a leak that has ColoCrossing employees, then that makes two leaks.  I'll have to dig for it, but I am 100% positive that a leak was released that only had yours, Jere's, Luc's, and someone else at CVPS admin accounts.  I'll PM you with anything I find.

I've said what I mean.  I invite you to actually prove your claims. I also invite you to elaborate on how you obtained this so-called knowledge.  Like I said before, there's only two outcomes here.  1) you're full of shit, and 2) Jon's been violating client confidentiality and giving you some...

Your choices are not dependent on how I act, sir.  I hold nothing at all over you - simply pointing out what I felt was an unintentional jab in your last comment.

Were there two leaks? O_o  I could've sworn the one I saw posted was from like the end of October.. and I'm positive that there weren't any CC staff accounts in that one.

The best tip I can give you then, is you'll want to avoid my style of slipping an insult into helpful 'advice' :P