Search results

It's possible to do with TAP instead of TUN, but it's dirty and I wouldn't do it. Your best is to actually tunnel a /64. Dirty too, but at least is a proper implementation on the OpenVPN side: http://wiki.nyr.bz/ipv6_tunnel_broker_openvpn_openvz

Not just about them. Promising not to keep logs on any commercial service isn't viable. Also, even if you controlled all your equipment and hosted your own VPN, your upstream is going to have logs anyway.

Answering to your question: yes, it is a lie, obviously. Simple as that.

> OpenVPN road warrior installer for Debian-based distros.

And what am I supposed to do with that information? At least, please paste the following info so I can take a look: - Client connection log - Output of ipconfig /all - Output of route print

Happy to help :)

So I ended up testing all this and writing about it. No, D. Strout, I don't want money in exchange :)

Some people asked about setting up OpenVPN to hand out dual stack connectivity, but looks like no one actually wrote about it. I wanted to set it up on a humble OpenVZ container and a big subnet wasn't available, so I worked around that too. Even while the setup is pretty hackish, it works...

Do you care to read the script? It's totally different, your "magical commands" are for the commercial edition.

I understand, but that's a big pain and a security risk for the customers.

Yeah, I think that's a bit unreasonable too, so I don't use them. I understand the problem with spam, but if this were the norm, scammers would simply send photoshopped scans, not difficult to do.

You fail to understand that contacting them asking for help with MaxMind is asking for support.

Out of stock already.

IPs are from them, not QuadraNet. What part of: - No support - No guarantees of any kind - Service is experimental Didn't you understand? This is simply a testbed for them, even the domain name suggests so. If you want to get a reliable, supported service, you are going to need more than $3/year.

Really unmetered? For sure, much better than 1TB @ gigabit.

No. Possible, but no so easy on OVZ, for example. Also, added latency. Isn't crazy, has its applications.

To use IPv6 over v4 natively with OpenVPN 2.3+ you do need: - An assigned subnet bigger than a /112 (since OpenVPN needs at least one /112 for itself). - To set "server-ipv6" on server.conf to the subnet you want to use for OpenVPN. - To push the routes you want for IPv6: push "route-ipv6...

You can do IPv6 over IPv4 natively with OpenVPN 2.3, as long as you have a little IPv6 subnet available. I don't know if there is any kind of tutorial available, sorry.

You can't sell this. As others said it's trademark infringement.

This exit policy is pretty good to prevent P2P and other kinds of abuse, but you are going to get some even if only port 80 is allowed: https://trac.torproject.org/projects/tor/wiki/doc/ReducedExitPolicy As others said, it can take hours/days until you start to get some traffic, just check the...