Search results

That word probably doesn't mean what you think it means. That you can see the source doesn't make it "open-source", at best you could say something has a "visible source" or "readable source". It's not open-source unless it complies with this definition.

What datacenter(s)?

No, that's not how it works. That's a perfect example of security through obscurity, which isn't actually security. Your code should be secure from a purely technical point of view. If you need to hide your code to keep it 'secure', there is almost certainly something wrong with your code, and...

No idea about Virtualizor, but the code quality of SolusVM is absolutely atrocious - easily some of the worst PHP I've ever seen. The issues with SolusVM largely stem from poor developer habits. If you use a reasonable platform (not PHP), abstract things correctly, are aware of the different...

Nonsense.

FWIW, future advice: http://blog.civiccommons.org/2011/01/be-open-from-day-one/ :)

FYI, that's a better ROI than almost every other project in existence that runs on donations. Most of them don't even have their expenses covered.

I've used Linux and OpenOffice while in school, and I've had zero issues.

Yes, that reason primarily being artificial vendor lock-in through "school programmes" by Microsoft - exactly the kind of thing you're encouraging here.

You'll want to make sure to have PlayOnLinux installed. Just in case at some point she wants to play Windows games :)

Huh. Seems like Inception Hosting is also on the list.

Another thing that popped into my mind; there might be a children-oriented image in the SUSE Studio Gallery. Those are basically all openSUSE derivatives with custom features/packages/configuration/etc.

These might be useful: http://opensource.com/education/14/1/teaching-kids-linux and http://www.brighthub.com/computing/linux/articles/43224.aspx Really, though? Ordering things from Amazon at 3 years old? I'm impressed.

#1 non-residential, actually.

Hmm. Not bad per se, but the positioning of the balloon seems "off", and there should definitely be more padding around the logo in the forum theme:

As far as I understand, it's not the same bug, but a similar one that's a little more complex.

Well, at least they notified their customers properly. A certain provider didn't even manage to do that correctly...

That is an absolutely ridiculous vulnerability. And it does indeed smell of backdoor.

For people who got fucked by ChicagoVPS?