Search results

Tonight's trivia question: what VPS company name fits in the black rectangle?

Or just make your backup target append-only.

There are actually a few notable differences (assuming it works the same as the Dutch chip + pin system): Your 'secret key' (CVV2 for a credit card, PIN for a chip card) is never transmitted to a third party that is not a bank. You would, for example, never enter your PIN on an e-commerce site...

Quite cool. Have a parts list by any chance?

No. It's because you're an arrogant asshole.

But you are a provider! :)

Ah, but see, that's Chris Faboozi, not Chris Fabozzi! Clearly it's a different person!

This would be business suicide; as far as ICANN and such are concerned, the domain is owned by the person in the WHOIS details. As long as ColoCrossing is listed as domain owner, they can take control of the domain at any point in time, and Chris would be screwed. Perhaps that is because BuyVM...

Soooo... who remembers this thread on LowEndTalk? I was bored yesterday, and I figured I'd dig a little. And guess what I found? Have a look at the who.is page that the above thread refered to, and be sure to note the date: Well, big deal, right? That WHOIS data must be from before Chris...

You still have to refund me for that chair you broke. It was an IKEA chair, but still... :)

The question was asked a month ago, and I have been waiting for an answer since. Post that answer, perhaps?

Bookmarked. Let's see how long this offer will last for.

Perhaps I'm doing that because the last time I posted about it on LET, I didn't get a response at all. And seeing as you're reading the thread here, and I have assurance that my posts won't magically disappear / be changed / whatever, that seems like a much more viable prospect than asking the...

Personally, I'm confused as to why Santrex is still alive - or well, the website is, anyway, boasting "500 GBPS DDoS protection". Did they deadpool or not? Huh? The two are not mutually exclusive. Nope.

I've kept an eye on the feedback thread for a while after posting in it, and never actually saw a response to what I suggested. I'm not sure what my post is supposed to prove, beyond "joepie91 goes to LET to post in the feedback thread when asked to do so".

So, how about that disclaimer of ownership in the footer that I asked about in the feedback thread, after you asked me to post the question there?

If rumours can kill your company, there's something wrong with either your business model, or your attitude towards (potential) customers. Personally I consider transparency quite a bit more important than "protecting poorly run companies from falling apart". Not to mention that closing a thread...

That would be a typical example of making something a pain for users, while barely adding any additional security.

Note how, as usual, he doesn't outright deny owning HVH. "Yeah well, I didn't lie, you just didn't ask the right question."