If you wish to twist words to make a "truth"... well, we've already made our public statement. And attempting to base your entire arguement over "He said something that might be considered admittance" just makes you look... well, foolish, to be honest.Or the third:
3) I am right, and you are acting like the famous so called "puppeteer" fishing for answers you dont know.
You gave me the answer in that Skype chat. Gratz!
I'm so glad you are so perfect, as such mind helping me. I am looking for a faggot to be a poster boy for my new show called Bustin Jeibers
"That person from the LET chat" was him, Mun. The skype log I posted there is the same one I linked earlier in this thread. We also clarified his confusion on that thread as well - the choice of not believing is his. And honestly, given his very well known history of blatant lies, is irrelevant.So you didn't tell that person from that LET chat where he tried to bash you guys all the way to the ground for shilling.
Phenomenal. You would think after complete disregard and avoidance, that he might take the hint. >_<I'm so glad you are so perfect, as such mind helping me. I am looking for a faggot to be a poster boy for my new show called Bustin Jeibers
Yeah that oneHmmmmmmm this one is my favorite. http://i.imgur.com/tSyX6q1.png
Still doing it 2 years later. Kinda cute.
Well, if you did, wouldn't that make you a candidate for the Jeiber thing?Once again why don't you forget about it, and move on?
I'm not taking ass holes kindly on this forum.
The IO of that one was like 600-something.
Prove it :3 Except... that's right, you can't. The best you can manage is trying to misinterpret a single line from a chat logHmmmmmmm this one is my favorite. http://i.imgur.com/tSyX6q1.png
Still doing it 2 years later. Kinda cute.
I guess someone has to show you. http://knowyourmeme.com/memes/shit-was-so-cash-copypastaI'm not "Perfect"
But, you have a very firm grasp of the obvious, so you're doing just fine ^_^I'm not "Perfect"
If you honestly have to ask that, then you don't know Fran or myself at all.So wait, who is lying?
I agree completely, it's just as silly and nonsensical a misinterpretation as claiming CVPS and ColoCrossing are the same entity. Take that how you want, since the fact remains we use nested virtualization on only a couple nodes (none of which have client VPSes).Is it a misinterpret when it may well be the truth? That is just silly and doesnt make sense.
Teaching by example, sir :3 But to be blunt - if you honestly take that as anything more than a playful jab with no real insult behind it, just let me know. So far I'm under the impression that we're having a bit of good natured fun, a little relief from the oh-so-serious internets.hmmm suggested advice? I think we were just talking about this.