I'm not really one to judge or talk here, but I feel like this suggestion is one that's technically "easy" on paper and much more difficult to apply in real life.You're stating I have attitude because I believe there is an easy solution for this?
I think you need to re-read what I wrote, it has no "attitude" in there at all.
For example, some people can name their datacenter as Incero, another individual can label it as Incero, LLC. By your method (if I'm reading it correctly) leaves it open for multiple "Incero"s while Novacha's method is much simpler and prevents these multiple "datacenter spam". In addition, it's a possibility whoever's submitting the offers may try to look like they're the only individual in that datecenter and might purposefully do this.
You might say "well, then have it look at for similar characters/series of characters then categorize it based off of that". Well, while this may work "roughly", I'd rather not bet my cards on it working all the time and either way then the problem gets a bit more difficult.
I believe Novacha was thinking a bit further ahead and was observing what the possible issues could be while you (SrsX) might have been thinking it was a simple change in a few lines of code.
Therefore, the simplest way to minimize this issue is to manually add/remove datacenters in order to avoid the "clusterfuck" of having to moderate specific categories, move it over, etc.
Be excellent to each other please Also Novacha, this is getting better and better now. Great job!