Never!Maturity is knowing when and where to be immature.
Study that.
You'll never take me alive!Maturity is knowing when and where to be immature.
Study that.
Just about summed up the thread for meWe can not provide much unless it is for legal reason or protected witch is not going to happen on this forum.
I can pass a trusted person the last pm chat log.
I should quote @Nekki from LETJust about summed up the thread for me
He was given 1 year of 32MB-Yearly in return for a reviewThe title is weird.
You gave him a trial copy of a VPS, correct?
What made you suspect him of sending a DoS attack that prompted you looking inside of his container?
Where is the chat log or proof of his threat to sue?
Sorry, a tad lost.
Pm: http://pastebin.com/Pmn4HyKr (were he threatened to sue me).IRC is a public medium so anything that was said on IRC can be pasted on a forum.
Either paste it and shed some light on this or shut up and STOP posting your dramas on here. Getting really sick of it now.
Pm: http://pastebin.com/Pmn4HyKr (were he threatened to sue me).
Main irc log one: http://pastebin.com/JRtfKGVD (Limited as i was not expecting to record anything or have any issues that day).
Him being vary rude on irc: http://pastebin.com/k9fM1X4j (Taken right after chat log one so you might need to go a few lines down).
If anyone has better logs post post them.
Service: Freenode
Channel: #lowendbox
The PM one is vary good to read.I have all the logs and they're a waste of anybody's time, alas not even worth reading.
Clearly this is sort of thing you get a kick out of.The PM one is vary good to read.
I have proof of you run DOS attacks against clouldflare hong kong.FraudRecord updated. Previous and now.
Summary: I find it slightly comical that Matthew Morgan of all people accuses me of running (D)DoS attacks. It is sly that Matthew accuses of me of using a 'trial account', maybe so that he can not be challenged to provide any details on the payment transaction for the service? Is he in habit of giving away free VPS services? I was willing to give Matthew full written permission to post all of the 'personal' details he alleges to have on me, however he insisted this must be done via a 'legal person' to be effective despite failing to provide me with any details of how to reach his solicitor.
Perhaps we can get this thread locked now, left in place for all to see?