Search results

YES YES YES if not it not worth squat   If you acquired the host an moved it to you own infrastructure  you would burn almost a /22 even on the low end side of leasing IP's you would make more just leasing the blocks out  than this host makes so its worth  negative dollars   :( 

had the same issue  with a few clients it turned out to be similar to the post above Log into PayPal Click the ‘Profile’ link in the menu bar under ‘My Account’ Click the ‘Language Encoding’ link under the ‘Selling Preferences’ column Click ‘More Options’ Set ‘Encoding’ to ‘UTF-8’ Click ‘Save’...

Just a smidge  faster 

AlienVPS  dead pooled sometime in  12-2014  there ip's are announced to the NJ IX 

I'm going to make a guess its a  E5520

And what would you think a fair price would be for a managed VPS ??

Get a few of those now and then its usually the same customer(s) or my favorite  my mails broke please fix  with no information. We always politely ask for more information and sometimes even give them the steps  on how to format a perfect ticket so we can diagnose the issue instantly. but low...

I don't think clients really care as long as it works :) I personally miss the old days of no panels

perhaps this will help http://serverfault.com/questions/653664/cant-receive-mails-from-gmail

That's just for XEN/KVM and SFTP does work for both

I completely forgot about it til may kids mauled me early this morning :)  

Thanks for the review ManDude old post but it slipped by   It's not that we can not provide client controlled rDNS but our core business is manged and a lot of the managed clients do not know what rDNS is so we usually set it up for them during provisioning when they have a fully qualified TLD...

no there is no real way 10 be 100%  except ask your provider     :)

Have one in South bend IN and Las Vegas looks like your good for Las Vegas. will it run on centos ?? was thinking  on throwing it on a server that has stuff on it all ready ?? you have to use the https  version of  the CA website I have not noticed it failing  but I don't use it that often ...

Virtualizor  cant speak for the OpenVZ  implementation because we don't use it, have not had many issues with XEN/KVM if there is a bug they listen and fix it quickly.

I would wait a few versions centos7 has been out since last year and its still a POS updated a centos 7 machine today and low & behold it would not boot "could not find root filesystem" had to go back a kernel its happened 2 or three times since its inception. reminds me of the old Redhat...

If your going to reinvent the wheel make a better wheel

its because cogent will not play nice http://www.datacenterknowledge.com/archives/2009/10/22/peering-disputes-migrate-to-ipv6/ its going to keep happening probably you are right need all 3  cogent, he and level 3   or another peer that peers with  both he & cogent if they are dealing with...

I have not tested SolusVM in a long while  but I think Virtualizor passed them up a while go on the features 1. not that we need it  but no goofy requirement to run a master  on openvz 2. as far as I know i think its the only panel that supports Xenserver (Citrix)

We have been using Virtualizor since Version 1  no complaints  features keep getting better & better.