Maybe it was owned before they moved into CC Dallas?I can't be 1000% sure. No one can. The filing also did say they have assets. This is likely hardware.
If it was rented - I wonder why there just wasn't a spat on LET about payment and cc like some other threads we've been seeing
Hostrail had like 10k active VM's or something like that.From LEB offer:
"They currently serve over 3500 clients on their fully owned vps hardware."
How does a company with 3500 clients go instantly tits up?
Atleast Shard didn't email saying CC are increasing our bills by 65% we need more money.Hostrail had like 10k active VM's or something like that.
Francisco
I would have paid to have access for one more day... I now am out one year of prepaid service and a little data. Nothing major, but 1 hour notice is classless.Atleast Shard didn't email saying CC are increasing our bills by 65% we need more money.
75%+ probably.Odd thing to happen so quickly. Who all has lost data?
Really? All I can say is how stupid.Hostrail had like 10k active VM's or something like that.
Francisco
Less than an hour intact. My email came through at 18:55 GMT, reports of the nodes shutting down started coming in at 19:40 GMT.75%+ probably.
Total "heads up" was < 2 hours I think?
Francisco
Good christ.Less than an hour intact. My email came through at 18:55 GMT, reports of the nodes shutting down started coming in at 19:40 GMT.
Who knows, lol.I thought the WHMCS exploit was back in March? That's the one where the emailed clients.
Unless they were hit again?
My dealings are with U.S. Law so I'm not quite sure to what extent this may be applicable.I thought the WHMCS exploit was back in March? That's the one where the emailed clients.
Unless they were hit again?
Legal action is a possibility. The other thing I can see is tax implications. They could have been filing tax returns and the accountant realized the numbers didn't add up etc?My dealings are with U.S. Law so I'm not quite sure to what extent this may be applicable.
http://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/1998/29/contents
ShardHost was a company registered in the UK, where their data was stolen, maybe someone took legal action against ShardHost.
The thing is there are just to many possibilities to cover, we will have to wait for an official announcement or perhaps a leak from a former employee.
Forgive my stupidity, but cleaning up from data issue would be time, usually.
WHMCS exploit...........Unless they were hit again?
My dealings are with U.S. Law so I'm not quite sure to what extent this may be applicable.
http://www.legislati...998/29/contents
ShardHost was a company registered in the UK, where their data was stolen, maybe someone took legal action against ShardHost.
The security breach notification sent to customers should include the following information:
3) Notify breaches to your subscribers
You may also need to tell your subscribers. If the breach is likely to adversely affect their personal data or privacy you need to, without unnecessary delay, notify them of the breach. You need to tell them:
your name and contact details
the estimated date of the breach
a summary of the incident
the nature and content of the personal data
likely effect on the individual
any measures you have taken to address the breach
how they can mitigate any possible adverse impact of the breach
You do not need to tell your subscribers about a breach if you can demonstrate that the data was encrypted.
If you don’t tell subscribers, the ICO can require you do so, if it considers the breach is likely to have an adverse effect on them.