Search results

Heh, man, we had one like that with us for ages.  Hosted most of the guy's company for quite awhile at no cost to him because he was friends with the boss and tugged Fran's heartstrings with "I can barely afford food for my kid", etc. Then I find out the guy buys himself a brand new gaming...

Does the "idea feedback stage" include your last 5 threads where you wanted everyone else to do your research for you?

People? Responsible? *cackle*

To put it bluntly... it's your attitude.  Case in point: Is Fabozzi really that much of a role model to you?  And sure, it's great that you want to be friendly with your upstream.  But you should not let that blind you others' experiences.  Call a spade a spade - no matter how nice Biloh is...

And how exactly do you plan on checking this, outside of snooping on your clients' data? According to your VPS Page: [bW]* @ 1Gbps So, let's do some math.  100TB is 102400GB per month.  1Gbps is 128MB/s.  If we take a month with 31 days, that's 334,800GB per month (60s * 60m * 24h * 24d ==...

Define legitimate.  And how about some proof that you won't be capping transit?

Theoretical, haven't tried this myself to see if it'll even work. Remotely mount the GVH VM's /dev/null to a couple of machines that can actually use their CPU/etc, and have bandwidth to spare.  'DD' out test files the size of your choice to the mounted path.. for example, creating a 100TB file...

That's one of the worst attempts at obfuscation I've ever seen.

Not at all.  The ONLY twisting here is you selectively ignoring inquiries, and making evasive replies.  Here, I'll make this easy for you: True or False? True or False?

Low cost, low resource IPv6-only.  I hope the IP Space is in your name, or you're going to end up with a pissed-off upstream after major IRC networks start blacklisting /64s.

So you were fine with posting your projected income from last month.. but a screenshot of the same chart for this month to back up your claims is a no-go?  That alone tells plenty.   Let's touch on something you said earlier, in reference to your dealings with HVH:   Now, let's look at another...

Of course they 'go through you' now.  Fabozzi and crew were shitcanned from WHT. Still ignoring the fact that a simple screenshot would back your claims of 'mass increase in sales'.  Or are you pretty much accepting at this point that nobody's going to believe you?

Well, that's awkward.  Does your 'not directly affiliated' upstream approve of you speaking for them?  Or is mindreading the 'special arrangement' you spoke of earlier? I guess you're just going to ignore my prior post?

Given the lack of statistics for this month, I find that to be a perfectly logical estimate.  You don't actually think people are going to believe your we experienced significant and massive growth over the past month claim without any backing, do you? After all, you could just take another...

The problem isn't related to their other clients/etc, but with their staff.  Catch me on IRC or PM sometime tomorrow and I'll go more into detail.

Everyone has been looking at GVH lately - and not in a positive way in the slightest.  Or did you miss

I love how this place is turning into HF.

I suppose some folks post before they think, and end up with regrets.  Honestly, I've always preferred WHT's method - edit/etc as much as you want, until the thread gets another reply.  People that go back and change their posts after someone replies to them are one of my pet peeves.

Stalking and voyeurism.

Literally just mtr -u, with the -u flag telling MTR to use UDP instead of ICMP.  Really wish testing TCP was that simple.. but alas you're pretty much stuck resorting to doing tcpdumps on both ends for that.