Did you own the machine that is hosting the SpeedTest file?... I did a wget cron for a 2GB speedtest file, every minute. Got to 1.66TB before my VPS mysteriously stopped working. According to a support ticket it got compromised and was participating in a DDoS ...
I'll happily buy a hosting plan with the company that was hosting the speedtest server - that company does offer an unlimited bandwidth plan for $20.Did you own the machine that is hosting the SpeedTest file?
While a ridiculous waste of resources, wget-ing a single file from a SpeedTest network repeatedly is not a 'DOS'. That's the excuse you use to justify terminating a stupid client after realizing you've bitten off WAY more than you can chew. Hence why you no longer offer the plan at all.Last I checked, DoS attacks were illegal in the United States.
Thank you! If GVH had not had the riduclous 100TB lie of an offer nobody (not me, not anybody else) would have even tried this.While a ridiculous waste of resources, wget-ing a single file from a SpeedTest network repeatedly is not a 'DOS'. That's the excuse you use to justify terminating a stupid client after realizing you've bitten off WAY more than you can chew. Hence why you no longer offer the plan at all.
Here's a tip - if you don't want users to download a file at high enough speeds to piss off daddy Biloh, PLACE A CAP. Next you're going to try and claim that Mun was 'instigating a DDoS' by seeding legal torrents.
So... No? If you owned the box hosting the file I'd be defending you but you were not only wasting GVH resources, which I guess was the idea, you were also wasting the resources of the speedtest server.I'll happily buy a hosting plan with the company that was hosting the speedtest server - that company does offer an unlimited bandwidth plan for $20.
Since when was downloading a 2GB test file with the server owner's consent illegal? Just wondering.Last I checked, DoS attacks were illegal in the United States.
A guy said If I took a gun and shot him in the head he wouldn't die..... I didn't believe him so I shot him in the head.... sadly now I am in prison for the rest of my life because I was an idiot, and shot a guy in the head knowing it would kill him.Thank you! If GVH had not had the riduclous 100TB lie of an offer nobody (not me, not anybody else) would have even tried this.
Do not mess with my catalysthost >:|Next up seems to be CatalystHost offering 333TB bandwidth at $12/year.
Since when was downloading a 2GB test file with the server owner's consent illegal? Just wondering.
The contract Mr Shove entered into with GVH entitled him to use 100TB of bandwidth monthly. He only used 1.6% of the amount he paid for. If Jon is engaging in false advertising by advertising 100TB and then not allowing people to use what they paid for (or altering the terms of the contract after the customer paid) then he should be reported to the FTC. It's not a violation of the law to download a file with the owner's consent, but it is a violation of consumer protection laws to engage in deceptive/false advertising.but you were not only wasting GVH resources
Would have been smart. Or got a server at Wholesale internet which is unmetered. But I wasn't about to sink $50 into something. I shouldn't have to pay $50 to use a $5 VPS.I guess that what Mr. Shove needed to do is have a VPS at GVH and one with another company that offers the same plan (if any), then transmit the file back and forward between his own 2 VPS using openVPN. That is for sure NOT a DoS of any kind. Both of your VPS are yours.
But its worth. Remember the iPad! That's over $300.00Would have been smart. Or got a server at Wholesale internet which is unmetered. But I wasn't about to sink $50 into something. I shouldn't have to pay $50 to use a $5 VPS.
Do you think the owner consents to shovenose downloading that file repeatedly if they sent in an abuse report to ColoCrossing?You're forgetting that Jon also thinks it is illegal for a customer to entitle a thread "GreenValueHost (not very knowledgable)"
Mr Shove not too wisely wasted resources (not to mention using an incredibly insecure password), but what he did was in no way, shape, or form a DoS attack.
denial of service attacks for dummies
The contract Mr Shove entered into with GVH entitled him to use 100TB of bandwidth monthly. He only used 1.6% of the amount he paid for. If Jon is engaging in false advertising by advertising 100TB and then not allowing people to use what they paid for (or altering the terms of the contract after the customer paid) then he should be reported to the FTC. It's not a violation of the law to download a file with the owner's consent, but it is a violation of consumer protection laws to engage in deceptive/false advertising.
So much time on forums, so little time addressing the Buffalo node issues I'm experiencing.Do you think the owner consents to shovenose downloading that file repeatedly if they sent in an abuse report to ColoCrossing?
Shove was DoS'ing a speed test file. Missed the first D for distributed. He needed a GVH VPS in a second geographic location to achieve that.OK, that makes more sense....
One machine doing wget on 2gb file every mine is DDoS.... Do you know what DDoS is?
facepalms
DDoS is Distrubuted Denial of Service, where more than one machine / server is perticipating in a attack.
DOS is a single machine.
facepalms
But you can't buy that plan. Never in stock. Plus 128MB plan even further limits creative use of BW.Next up seems to be CatalystHost offering 333TB bandwidth at $12/year.