More spam from the CC network.. bahaha....Report the unsolicited email that you are receiving an unable to unsubscribe from as spam.
The CAN-SPAM act requires that all unsubscribe requests be honored within 10 business days. I only mention this because I've requested 6 times dating back to last October to be unsubscribed from Fabspammer's CVPS spam and all requests have been ignored (yeah, the latest CVPS spam arrived this morning...forwarded to abuse@cc with a not nice message).Report the unsolicited email that you are receiving an unable to unsubscribe from as spam.
Each separate email in violation of the CAN-SPAM Act is subject to penalties of up to $16,000, so non-compliance can be costly. But following the law isn’t complicated. Here’s a rundown of CAN-SPAM’s main requirements:
- Tell recipients where you’re located. Your message must include your valid physical postal address. This can be your current street address, a post office box you’ve registered with the U.S. Postal Service, or a private mailbox you’ve registered with a commercial mail receiving agency established under Postal Service regulations.
- Tell recipients how to opt out of receiving future email from you. Your message must include a clear and conspicuous explanation of how the recipient can opt out of getting email from you in the future. Craft the notice in a way that’s easy for an ordinary person to recognize, read, and understand. Creative use of type size, color, and location can improve clarity. Give a return email address or another easy Internet-based way to allow people to communicate their choice to you. You may create a menu to allow a recipient to opt out of certain types of messages, but you must include the option to stop all commercial messages from you. Make sure your spam filter doesn’t block these opt-out requests.
- Honor opt-out requests promptly. Any opt-out mechanism you offer must be able to process opt-out requests for at least 30 days after you send your message. You must honor a recipient’s opt-out request within 10 business days. You can’t charge a fee, require the recipient to give you any personally identifying information beyond an email address, or make the recipient take any step other than sending a reply email or visiting a single page on an Internet website as a condition for honoring an opt-out request. Once people have told you they don’t want to receive more messages from you, you can’t sell or transfer their email addresses, even in the form of a mailing list. The only exception is that you may transfer the addresses to a company you’ve hired to help you comply with the CAN-SPAM Act.
Better to get out before the shit hits the fan, big time.Thank you, Your email has now been removed from our mailing list.
The email address that has been receiving the CVPS spam since last October isn't the email address I used when I had an account at CVPS. It's the one I used with UGVPS so obviously UGVPS email addresses were being shared with CVPS before the official takeover was announced on January 26.
Doesn't always work though - I remember when a certain reasonably popular Swiss dedicated/colo provider spammed half of WHT and their reply to the many people who complained was pretty much "suck it, you signed up for emails from us" (despite it not being the case)WHT is a great place to report the abuse, as well. Historically, whenever someone couldn't get a reply from their abuse@, bringing the issue to public light over there spurred Ernie and Biloh to fix things in a hurry.
Bring anything to Ernie's attention and he'll fix it quickly. He isn't just about the public image, he's really a great guy.WHT is a great place to report the abuse, as well. Historically, whenever someone couldn't get a reply from their abuse@, bringing the issue to public light over there spurred Ernie and Biloh to fix things in a hurry.
Y'know, I've heard a few people say that now. And it honestly makes me feel sorry for the guy - I have no firsthand experience with the bloke, but my opinion of him was already very badly coloured due to the CC association.Bring anything to Ernie's attention and he'll fix it quickly. He isn't just about the public image, he's really a great guy.
By contract, not before April 2015, although I think the contract was actually signed in July... it's 2 years from signature.Where is my favorite @AnthonySmith? He said I was full of crap on the UGVPS stuff and he jabbed at me about 123Systems too I do believe.
Choke on it. The whole thing
Feels good to be right, and vindication sees it's day in the sun. Meanwhile friends and deniers allowed paying customers to be slapped around and robbed by CVPS for all this time. Tsk tsk tsk.
Maybe the naysayers will get I am not weaving fiction.
Where's @Rallias at? Come have a party.
Next domino to fall - BlueVM. Cough it up.
The way I see it: a job is a job. He gets paid to work for ColoCrossing and you cannot hold a man doing an honest days work accountable for his employer's shady tactics/practices. Honestly, if you didn't know ColoCrossing owned HudsonValleyHost, you'd 100% think Ernie was the owner. He works that hard. Seriously, it's absurd how much he puts into the company. He really is an amazing guy who is doing his best, and then some.Y'know, I've heard a few people say that now. And it honestly makes me feel sorry for the guy - I have no firsthand experience with the bloke, but my opinion of him was already very badly coloured due to the CC association.
I guess I see it differently. In today's job market, as long as he's trying his best to be honest and not fall into the shady tactics, what's the problem? He also is very separate from a lot of the CC stuff.Job's a Job, sure... but it's still someone's choice on whether to swallow their ethics and work for a known corrupt company. Of course, you can't discount the chance that he's kept his head down and is unaware of all the.. unsavoury acts CC gets involved with. But I can't find enough altruism within me to consider that plausible.
That's a pretty good summary of it, honestly. We just have different subjective outlooks on the whole thing. Probably the best way to wrap it up is with - you know Ernie, and can give a better judgement of his character. My knowledge is limited to him being a part of CC; and once you consider all the other names associated with that brand, my suspicion is fairly justifiedI guess I see it differently.
Oh, completely justified. Haha, it's kind of scary how they just keep giving new reasons every time it starts to quiet down.That's a pretty good summary of it, honestly. We just have different subjective outlooks on the whole thing. Probably the best way to wrap it up is with - you know Ernie, and can give a better judgement of his character. My knowledge is limited to him being a part of CC; and once you consider all the other names associated with that brand, my suspicion is fairly justified
A job is a job, fine. But who logically and ethically continues showing up and doing the dog show when the company is running all sorts of scams? (spam, malicious customer base, mass IP soilage, various downstream scams, various ownership scams) I doubt Ernie is just an employee Expect a hybrid role as he brings a lot more to the table than the tiny wanna be kids "companies". He has his own team of Indians for support that other CC companies use... cough.Job's a Job, sure... but it's still someone's choice on whether to swallow their ethics and work for a known corrupt company. Of course, you can't discount the chance that he's kept his head down and is unaware of all the.. unsavoury acts CC gets involved with. But I can't find enough altruism within me to consider that plausible.
Dear Mr. Spamhaus. I terminated the spammer on that IP. Trust me, I really did.Bring anything to Ernie's attention and he'll fix it quickly.
That's a pretty good summary of it, honestly. We just have different subjective outlooks on the whole thing. Probably the best way to wrap it up is with - you know Ernie, and can give a better judgement of his character. My knowledge is limited to him being a part of CC; and once you consider all the other names associated with that brand, my suspicion is fairly justified