bsdguy
Member
Yet another lie.
ishaq and budgetnode
- Thread starter bsdguy
- Start date
- Status
Yet another lie.
You can do that as well as him. That is not confidential information, or are you referring at PMs?
As for hiding the issue, which I think is the main problem here, why did not Ishaq ask someone else to do it, I think it was an obvious conflict of interests there... He could have asked Jarland, after all, he owed him a big favour for a similar thing.
Jordan
New Member
We'll know who's lying when you post those LET conversations.
PM's.
I agree, Ishaq should have asked for a second opinion. A lesson has been learnt.
PM's.
I agree, Ishaq should have asked for a second opinion. A lesson has been learnt.
bsdguy
Member
Hahaha. The LET conversations can't be posted anymore because ishaq from budgetnode - in a gross abuse of his admin power - massacred the threat and serial deleted posts.
Maybe it's easier to understand now why jordon asked for that - well knowing it's not possible.
But then, that was ishaqs desire in the first place to vanish everything he didn't like.
Maybe it's easier to understand now why jordon asked for that - well knowing it's not possible.
But then, that was ishaqs desire in the first place to vanish everything he didn't like.
Jordan
New Member
I don't know Vanilla.. but I'm fairly certain an admin cannot delete YOUR PM's. It is an inbox. Once received, they are there.
DomainBop
Dormant VPSB Pathogen
Case in point below:
BudgetNode Rep said:
rule #1a: never call out a customer in public, or start threads about them on a forum, no matter how much of an asshole you may think they are...
rule #1b: the customer doesn't have to defend themselves to a business on a public forum even if they publicly complained about the business.
rule #2: children with part time businesses who aren't lawyers shouldn't publicly accuse their customers of libel. If you feel you've been libeled you keep your mouth shut on public forums and other social media and instead do what adults do and consult an attorney.
I've always said that studying low end VPS "businesses" should be a requirement in business schools because they provide a perfect example of how not to run a business.
There is a reason why 99% of these "CEOs" and "Vice Presidents of Whatever" can't make a living from their businesses and end up deadpooling and this thread (and the related ones on LET) are a perfect example..
WasNotWSS" said:
If a provider offers to migrate you to a new node because the node you're on is overloaded...RUN to a new provider as fast as you can because if a provider can't manage the loads on their servers properly it won't be long before that brand new node is also suffering the same problems as the old one.
Jordan
New Member
Wow you're just rambling aimlessly now... I've been asking you to publish the PM's for ages... All I've done is requested you post them for the sake of providing a balanced argument (as did Lee), but clearly you were getting carried away.
At the time everyone was being moved to a new node, because the disk configuration in that location was inadequate. His move was just being fast tracked.
As for the rest of the post - what do you know about our background? Very little.
Last edited:
jarland
The ocean is digital
One post was deleted, the rest was split into another topic. All but that one post should be there. That one post is there again but I had to type it in my own reply, I had no other way to retrieve it due to vanilla not working. If I am mistaken, please PM me over there and let's talk about what else is missing.
The PM should definitely still be there for you and I can access it. LET PMs are not private from admins, but admins should not be simply reading them for fun. That is an ability that should be used to confirm things like someone selling services via PM or sending spam.
You were banned after being extended more courtesy than most other members for repeatedly taking threads into territories that they did not need to go (religion, politics, etc) culminating in your use of LET as a platform to declare that child molesters are victims. Every single piece of that conversation exists in a private forum for all moderators and admins to view at their convenience, because when we remove things it should be done transparently. This is not the place for your airing of grievances in my honest opinion, but it's not my forum so I'll leave that to others.
WasNotWSS
Member
Not to derail this drama-thread, but I decided to give the benefit of the doubt, since, hell- he's an Admin! Plus, his answer after I was moved took about a minute. Changing the MTU in 2017? Not quite so much. Hell, I don't even put up with that sort of hokiness on my personal network, and I still have 10/half JetDirect cards on segments of it.
It told me that they had an answer, but no control over the network itself, and that frightened me as much as a Bitcoin payment nulled-WHMCS in Ukrane.
You'll notice that at no point did I infer that you were unprofessional- as that was not my impression. Just didn't fit the bill for what I wanted at the time due to issues. I don't expect to get my ass sucked for $10/mo, but I also don't expect to be pushed away, either.
</derail>
Jordan
New Member
MTU change is down to the Voxility GRE tunnel. Not ideal, and soon will not be an issue.
bsdguy
Member
Thanks but there was no further confirmation needed; it was already clear that at budgetnode while playing admin they actually don't care a rats ass about rules. One of which is: private conversations are not made public.
You see I profoundly detest ishaq but rules are rules, hence I would under no circumstances publicly post a private conversation with him.
Not that it was needed but, voilà, there you have yet one more difference between you guys and me.
Jordan
New Member
Thanks but there was no further confirmation needed; it was already clear that at budgetnode while playing admin they actually don't care a rats ass about rules. One of which is: private conversations are not made public.
You see I profoundly detest ishaq but rules are rules, hence I would under no circumstances publicly post a private conversation with him.
Not that it was needed but, voilà, there you have yet one more difference between you guys and me.
Ishaq has given permission for them to be posted, and wants you to.
My experience with Voxility tunnels has never required an MTU change.
bsdguy
Member
I'll try to make that easy to understand: There are rules. Not publishing private conversations is one of those rules.
Now, I know and it has been amply proven that ishaq doesn't care a rats ass about rules and is more than happy to publish things that he came to know from private conversations, but that doesn't somehow magically change how the world works.
It is also known and amply proven that ishaq is dead-seriously believing that any- and everyone has to dance to his tune and to do whatever he pleases but, alas, that's a problem he'll have to address with a professional psychologist.
As far as I'm concerned I don't give a rats ass about what ishaq wants or wants not. I'll stick to the rules of the civilized world.
@Lee Strange that you say that. You are a mod and you should know that I sent the requested report incl. unedited PMs (except for credit card data). So, *obviously* it's not about hiding.
Ok, there are unwritten rules that private conversations should stay private, but if both agree then no issue. All it will do is add weight to your position for those of us on the outer edge of this.
Where? In my mind, if both parties agree for the content to be shared, by all means share it. You're only doing yourself a disservice by refusing to share at this point.
- Status