Mine will be here on Monday.It's here, it's here, it's here!
Too bad I'm leaving the house to enjoy the sunlight.
I'll play with it later!
Haha oh wait i uses microSDs now?Oh, derp... it requires a microSD card... the only one I have is being used for something else (Mobius actioncam)
Hrm. Guess I need to get a new microSD card...
Those numbers don't at quick glance look so hot.
What the hell is that? a new feature to off computers for government control? Strangest thing I've seen in a long while. Guess a case to protect it is necessary on that modelSo guys. Plug you new Pi in and have it running. Take a photo of it with a camera flash. It's likely going to cause your Pi to power down...
Don't believe me? http://www.raspberrypi.org/forums/viewtopic.php?f=28&t=99042
Someone covered that chip with blue-tac and confirmed it was the culprit as it stopped powering down afterwards:It appears that U16, the SMPS chip, is the culprit.
Yes, bit of bluetac on that chip and it survives the flash:
Looking at the board under strong light, both U8 and U16 are much more reflective than other chips,
but as you say covering U16 fixes the issue.
Why. Isn't the power being consumed by the Raspberry Pi not profitable at all?I love using my RPI, it's so lightweight - I use it with my S-crypt miner.
What is the electronic component that they covered in that blue-tac hack?It appears to only do it when taken with an xenon flash vs that of an LED flash. Strange indeed.
Someone covered that chip with blue-tac and confirmed it was the culprit as it stopped powering down afterwards:
What is the electronic component that they covered in that blue-tac hack?
It appears that U16, the SMPS chip, is the culprit.
That would appear to be a power related piece. Any discussion elsewhere about it? Unsure how someone accidentally missed this design shortcoming.What is the electronic component that they covered in that blue-tac hack?It appears that U16, the SMPS chip, is the culprit.
It's been mentioned in a few places today. It's now known, but interestingly enough this isn't the first time a component or piece of electrical equipment has experienced this...That would appear to be a power related piece. Any discussion elsewhere about it? Unsure how someone accidentally missed this design shortcoming.
Information Notice No. 97-82: Inadvertent Control Room Halon Actuation due to a Camera Flash
At 9:45 a.m., the training representative took a flash photograph of the alarm reset/silence pushbuttons inside the FDS control panel. The first flash caused an annunciator inside the panel to sound. The cabinet door on the panel was closed and an examination of the front panel showed no lock-in alarm indications. The cabinet door on the panel was reopened and a second flash photograph was taken within 2 minutes of the first picture. The second flash caused a second alarm with a different tone, indicating that system actuation was imminent. Within 3 to 5 seconds of the second flash, Halon discharged from the overhead nozzles. The discharge occurred at 9:47 a.m. and lasted for 10 to 12 seconds. It was characterized by a loud roar, fog, and significant air turbulence.
For starters, some embedded controllers in racks in the auxilliary deisel generator control rooms have EPROMs which have been known to be erased by camera flashes in the past, triggering a generator trip; for seconds, we had to wear protective clothing -- try explaining to a visitor that their expensive Nikon has been contaminated and needs to be left behind!
OMG, camera flash wiped EEPROM in nuclear facility and exposed people to radiation is what I got from that.