restarting: nocostvps freevps

[mtwiscool]

Do you see my issue with those two statements?


Aldryic has probably guessed right that it's an OVH Kimsufi. Don't get me wrong I have one myself for backups and a few other non public things.


I really don't think you are going to get far doing NAT, you had a post on WHT earlier trying to get help because it would not work!

We do not use OVH or Kimsufi

 

[MartinD]

So, what are you doing then?


Make sure your answer means something...

 

[mtwiscool]

I have Nat set up and fully working.


We be doing a beta In a few days.

 

[mtwiscool]

This sounds like an OVZ setup designed to phish/pharm data and keys. Remember folks, any host that runs OpenVZ can view any/all of your data, any time they want, without you being any the wiser. Be careful who you trust.

We not monitor what you do on your VPS unless we suspect abuse or get a DMCA

 

[Aldryic C'boas]

We not monitor what you do on your VPS unless we suspect abuse or get a DMCA

DMCA can be submitted by anyone, regardless of the validity of the claim. So what you're saying there is, you'll go rooting through someone's VPS at the first sketchy takedown request you get.

"Suspect Abuse". There are plenty of ways to check abuse on OVZ without actually compromising policy. This reads as "we'll go snooping through your VM whenever we feel like it".

 

[peterw]

We not monitor what you do on your VPS unless we suspect abuse or get a DMCA

The workflow I would consider:

• get DMCA
• forward it to customer (remove sender information)
• wait 24h hours
• read response of customer
• do valid action

 

[mtwiscool]

DMCA can be submitted by anyone, regardless of the validity of the claim. So what you're saying there is, you'll go rooting through someone's VPS at the first sketchy takedown request you get."Suspect Abuse". There are plenty of ways to check abuse on OVZ without actually compromising policy. This reads as "we'll go snooping through your VM whenever we feel like it".

We will only snoop on a VPS if we are required by law this includes DMCA.
As most abuse will set off a alame that auto sends a email to me for stuff like CPU abuse we will almost nerver will go into a vps

 

[mtwiscool]

<p>


The workflow I would consider:

• get DMCA
• forward it to customer (remove sender information)
• wait 24h hours
• read response of customer
• do valid action

That is how it's planned to happen valid action always depends on response

 

[Aldryic C'boas]

We will only snoop on a VPS

And you've just admitted to violating client privacy. The reason is irrelevant - you NEVER dig through client data without express permission from the client.

required by law this includes DMCA

Bullshit. There is NO law that requires you to dig through client data. At the absolute most, you might receive a court order to turn over data to law enforcement. And in no situation is a DMCA _ever_ legal grounds to force a provider's hand. All it boils doing to is a notification of unauthorized usage, typically with a request for removal - using it as an excuse to go dig through someone's VPS is downright dirty.

 

[mtwiscool]

We nerver have dug though users data.


So do not talk crap about me

 

[SeriesN]

You never had cause you never ran a business.


Do you know what is dmca btw?

 

[mtwiscool]

Digatal meleamuim copyright act


Writing on phone

 

[SeriesN]

What does that means? Do you also know where it is valid and where not?


Fyi, I am also on my phone.

 

[peterw]

Bullshit. There is NO law that requires you to dig through client data. At the absolute most, you might receive a court order to turn over data to law enforcement. And in no situation is a DMCA _ever_ legal grounds to force a provider's hand. All it boils doing to is a notification of unauthorized usage, typically with a request for removal - using it as an excuse to go dig through someone's VPS is downright dirty.

It is more than dirty. Bad excuse for peeping Tom.

 

[mtwiscool]

What does that means? Do you also know where it is valid and where not?


Fyi, I am also on my phone.

policy not finalised

 

[SeriesN]

policy not finalised

?

 

[mtwiscool]

?

whats for the question mark

 

[Aldryic C'boas]

The punishing lack of coherency, ethics, and common sense.

 

[RiotSecurity]

Oh no...

"not ovh" ... http://www.aquaray.com/

 

[mtwiscool]

Oh no...

"not ovh" ... http://www.aquaray.com/

we use readymakers who host at aquaray paris datacentre