Bacula4hosts here, good product. We originally got them to support solusvm + whmcs module.
cPremote has the cPanel plugin for customers but it rarely works as intended - I've got more support tickets "help, backup won't restore" than "thank god you have backup, I really appreciate it!" Let me rephrase that: I don't know of a single incident where anybody was actually happy with cPremote, myself or my customer(s) included. And, it was a b*tch to set up.
Enough bashing of the useless product. But I will figure something out! Bacula4Hosts seems promising if not somewhat convoluted of a pricing scheme. Wish they offered it on LicensePal, then it would actually make sense LOL.
I thought Bacula was free ? I've never used it personally, I stick to rsync for my personal backups. God love Nick_A and his 50 GB of storage on a 128 plan... Licensepal and bacula? Good luck. They do not need licensepal to handle any advertising for them. Bacula is a big boy in the backup scene. You will never see lower pricing then you have seen on their site. I have personally spoke with developers of bacula and they cannot offer lower pricing. I do not know how private the information was I was given so this is all I will say...
Tarsnap is awesome but expensive. I use it for a few critical things (my PasswordSafe files, etc.)I am using tarsnap for my servers. Data is encrypted on client side (client code is open source) and then stored on Amazon's servers. It is pretty light weight, so you can use it also on Raspberry Pi and other low powered ARM devices.
Pushing from the client, manually, forced to enter a password, is perfectly safe.All this talk of rsync makes me nervous. But I suppose it depends on what you want.
rsync is fine if you just want another copy.
Personally, I want to be able to go back in time. Something goes haywire on Friday and I don't discover it until Monday. I want to be able to go back to Friday, not be stuck with a perfect copy of the haywire. May not even be the whole system - just to be able to pull a "last known good" config file or DB dump from a few days ago.
And remember kids...pull from the backup, don't push from the client. If your server is hacked, you don't want the attacker to also nuke your backups.
passwords and automated backups.Pushing from the client, manually, forced to enter a password, is perfectly safe.
I'd prefer to push A to B then have C pull from BPushing from the client, manually, forced to enter a password, is perfectly safe.
Or just make your backup target append-only.And remember kids...pull from the backup, don't push from the client. If your server is hacked, you don't want the attacker to also nuke your backups.
rsync with the backup option will move changed/deleted files to a dated directory and give you the ability to go back to a file that was changed at a certain date in the past.All this talk of rsync makes me nervous. But I suppose it depends on what you want.
rsync is fine if you just want another copy.
Personally, I want to be able to go back in time. Something goes haywire on Friday and I don't discover it until Monday. I want to be able to go back to Friday, not be stuck with a perfect copy of the haywire. May not even be the whole system - just to be able to pull a "last known good" config file or DB dump from a few days ago.
And remember kids...pull from the backup, don't push from the client. If your server is hacked, you don't want the attacker to also nuke your backups.