BuyVM - Leaving Buffalo Early

[Aldryic C'boas]

Gotta love how brave they get when he hides behind a monitor =P


Just waiting on networking now.

 

[drmike]

I am getting Level 3 to New Jersey also... Coming from Chicago.  Big improvement.

Choopa isn't round robining packets over multiple upstreams either

 

[tonyg]

Alright...my vps is online!

 

[drmike]

Unsure how many servers are running disk / RAID checksum stuff.  Node I am on is starved on disk IO right now.  Showing high system load.

If you are seeing the same, give it an hour or two and ideally it cleans up... That's before ticketing about it

Everything else seems to work --- so far.

 

[drmike]

Network looks good.

Download speed from CacheFly: 64.5MB/s
Download speed from Coloat, Atlanta GA: 18.2MB/s
Download speed from Softlayer, Dallas, TX: 27.4MB/s
Download speed from Linode, Tokyo, JP: 6.93MB/s
Download speed from Leaseweb, Haarlem, NL: 14.3MB/s
Download speed from Softlayer, Singapore: 4.96MB/s
Download speed from Softlayer, Seattle, WA: 16.4MB/s
Download speed from Softlayer, San Jose, CA: 16.7MB/s
Download speed from Softlayer, Washington, DC: 65.2MB/s

ping 4.2.2.2  (common Level 3 DNS server)
PING 4.2.2.2 (4.2.2.2) 56(84) bytes of data.
64 bytes from 4.2.2.2: icmp_req=1 ttl=58 time=1.32 ms
64 bytes from 4.2.2.2: icmp_req=2 ttl=58 time=1.34 ms
64 bytes from 4.2.2.2: icmp_req=3 ttl=58 time=1.22 ms
64 bytes from 4.2.2.2: icmp_req=4 ttl=57 time=1.43 ms
64 bytes from 4.2.2.2: icmp_req=5 ttl=58 time=1.26 ms
64 bytes from 4.2.2.2: icmp_req=6 ttl=58 time=1.35 ms

ping 8.8.8.8 (Google DNS resolver)

64 bytes from 8.8.8.8: icmp_req=1 ttl=43 time=14.6 ms
64 bytes from 8.8.8.8: icmp_req=2 ttl=43 time=14.7 ms
64 bytes from 8.8.8.8: icmp_req=3 ttl=43 time=14.5 ms
64 bytes from 8.8.8.8: icmp_req=4 ttl=43 time=14.7 ms
64 bytes from 8.8.8.8: icmp_req=5 ttl=43 time=14.4 ms
64 bytes from 8.8.8.8: icmp_req=6 ttl=43 time=14.6 ms

ping vpsboard.com (this is coast to coast then down to Vegas)
PING vpsboard.com (209.141.39.223) 56(84) bytes of data.
64 bytes from vpsboard.com (209.141.39.223): icmp_req=1 ttl=50 time=86.1 ms
64 bytes from vpsboard.com (209.141.39.223): icmp_req=2 ttl=50 time=81.3 ms
64 bytes from vpsboard.com (209.141.39.223): icmp_req=3 ttl=50 time=80.9 ms
64 bytes from vpsboard.com (209.141.39.223): icmp_req=4 ttl=50 time=81.1 ms
64 bytes from vpsboard.com (209.141.39.223): icmp_req=5 ttl=50 time=81.9 ms
64 bytes from vpsboard.com (209.141.39.223): icmp_req=6 ttl=50 time=80.9 ms
64 bytes from vpsboard.com (209.141.39.223): icmp_req=7 ttl=50 time=81.3 ms
64 bytes from vpsboard.com (209.141.39.223): icmp_req=8 ttl=50 time=83.0 ms

--- more like what I expect for such a long route.

It's 1 ms ~ to CloudFlare's front end.

Yeah, Choopa is an improvement.

 

[drmike]

PS: Load on server seems to have dropped to normal     So disk stuff has finished!

 

[MannDude]

Good news. Glad to see the move went relatively smooth

 

[JayCawb]

No one finally decided to put their foot up Chris's ass then? Shame, he's a c*nt.

I know we've not always seen eye to eye, but genuinely glad everything went good for you guys/gals.

 

[Aldryic C'boas]

Sitting in a Denny's now - Fran and I are tearing through some pancakes while he works on the Filtering and I get caught up on tickets.

 

[HalfEatenPie]

Sitting in a Denny's now - Fran and I are tearing through some pancakes while he works on the Filtering and I get caught up on tickets.

I wonder if they still have those Baconolia specials.  Anyways good luck with it all!  I'm sure you guys are ridiculously exhausted from it all! 

 

[marlencrabapple]

Sitting in a Denny's now - Fran and I are tearing through some pancakes while he works on the Filtering and I get caught up on tickets.

Don't get too mad when you deal with mine. I've already called myself an idiot enough for the both of us ;_;

 

[drmike]

Dudes, what is up with filtering?

Anyone here have BuyVM filtering out of NY?  Wondering how the route looks now to Choopa...  Sharing is caring...

 

[Reece-DM]

Network looks good.

Download speed from CacheFly: 64.5MB/s


Download speed from Coloat, Atlanta GA: 18.2MB/s


Download speed from Softlayer, Dallas, TX: 27.4MB/s


Download speed from Linode, Tokyo, JP: 6.93MB/s


Download speed from Leaseweb, Haarlem, NL: 14.3MB/s


Download speed from Softlayer, Singapore: 4.96MB/s


Download speed from Softlayer, Seattle, WA: 16.4MB/s


Download speed from Softlayer, San Jose, CA: 16.7MB/s


Download speed from Softlayer, Washington, DC: 65.2MB/s

ping 4.2.2.2  (common Level 3 DNS server)


PING 4.2.2.2 (4.2.2.2) 56(84) bytes of data.


64 bytes from 4.2.2.2: icmp_req=1 ttl=58 time=1.32 ms


64 bytes from 4.2.2.2: icmp_req=2 ttl=58 time=1.34 ms


64 bytes from 4.2.2.2: icmp_req=3 ttl=58 time=1.22 ms


64 bytes from 4.2.2.2: icmp_req=4 ttl=57 time=1.43 ms


64 bytes from 4.2.2.2: icmp_req=5 ttl=58 time=1.26 ms


64 bytes from 4.2.2.2: icmp_req=6 ttl=58 time=1.35 ms

ping 8.8.8.8 (Google DNS resolver)

64 bytes from 8.8.8.8: icmp_req=1 ttl=43 time=14.6 ms


64 bytes from 8.8.8.8: icmp_req=2 ttl=43 time=14.7 ms


64 bytes from 8.8.8.8: icmp_req=3 ttl=43 time=14.5 ms


64 bytes from 8.8.8.8: icmp_req=4 ttl=43 time=14.7 ms


64 bytes from 8.8.8.8: icmp_req=5 ttl=43 time=14.4 ms


64 bytes from 8.8.8.8: icmp_req=6 ttl=43 time=14.6 ms

ping vpsboard.com (this is coast to coast then down to Vegas)


PING vpsboard.com (209.141.39.223) 56(84) bytes of data.


64 bytes from vpsboard.com (209.141.39.223): icmp_req=1 ttl=50 time=86.1 ms


64 bytes from vpsboard.com (209.141.39.223): icmp_req=2 ttl=50 time=81.3 ms


64 bytes from vpsboard.com (209.141.39.223): icmp_req=3 ttl=50 time=80.9 ms


64 bytes from vpsboard.com (209.141.39.223): icmp_req=4 ttl=50 time=81.1 ms


64 bytes from vpsboard.com (209.141.39.223): icmp_req=5 ttl=50 time=81.9 ms


64 bytes from vpsboard.com (209.141.39.223): icmp_req=6 ttl=50 time=80.9 ms


64 bytes from vpsboard.com (209.141.39.223): icmp_req=7 ttl=50 time=81.3 ms


64 bytes from vpsboard.com (209.141.39.223): icmp_req=8 ttl=50 time=83.0 ms

--- more like what I expect for such a long route.

It's 1 ms ~ to CloudFlare's front end.

Yeah, Choopa is an improvement.

More or less the same as I'm getting from Clifton

 

[Lee]

I considered coming down, but Fran didnt want to meet me. Him and side show Bob are lying scum and their story doesnt reflect the truth and are the ones truly afraid. My sleep is far more valuable than meeting two degenerates that have nothing going for them.

Thank god they are out, and this can all be over. Good luck with your small over exaggerated company.

You have to love the bravery from afar.  If you had any balls you would have just went down anyway but your pussy prevented you.

 

[wlanboy]

Thank god they are out, and this can all be over.

So a win:win for both of you.

 

[wlanboy]

Wondering how the route looks now to Choopa...  Sharing is caring...

No filtering, but EU:

Germany:


2 ethernet1-1-9-c5-14-b2-cas1.pnj1.choopa.net (64.237.34.233) 0.806 ms 0.841 ms 0.910 ms
3 vl123-br2.pnj1.choopa.net (108.61.92.53) 1.479 ms 7.683 ms 7.784 ms
4 ae3.ar2.ewr1.us.nlayer.net (69.31.95.5) 4.653 ms 4.767 ms 4.873 ms
5 ae0-315.nyc41.ip4.tinet.net (199.229.230.93) 17.525 ms 17.479 ms 17.408 ms
6 ae4-133.nyc20.ip4.tinet.net (199.229.230.13) 1.310 ms xe-3-2-1.fra61.ip4.tinet.net (89.149.181.238) 105.170 ms ae4-133.nyc20.ip4.tinet.net (199.229.230.13) 1.618 ms
7 tinet.accelerated.de (77.67.73.26) 80.836 ms 80.756 ms

UK:


2 ethernet1-1-9-c5-14-b2-cas1.pnj1.choopa.net (64.237.34.233) 0.554 ms 0.675 ms 0.670 ms
3 vl123-br2.pnj1.choopa.net (108.61.92.53) 0.446 ms 2.393 ms 0.422 ms
4 ae3.ar2.ewr1.us.nlayer.net (69.31.95.5) 4.800 ms ae7.ar1.nyc3.us.nlayer.net (69.31.34.61) 2.712 ms ae3.ar2.ewr1.us.nlayer.net (69.31.95.5) 2.258 ms
5 ae5-30g.cr1.nyc2.us.nlayer.net (69.31.34.133) 2.871 ms ae0-315.nyc41.ip4.tinet.net (199.229.230.93) 15.990 ms 11.731 ms
6 xe-3-3-0.lon25.ip4.tinet.net (89.149.182.121) 94.925 ms ae4-133.nyc20.ip4.tinet.net (199.229.230.13) 1.353 ms xe-10-2-2.lon25.ip4.tinet.net (141.136.107.178) 96.961 ms
7 iomart-hosting-gw.ip4.tinet.net (77.67.74.226) 88.947 ms 96.117 ms 87.404 ms
8 iomart-hosting-gw.ip4.tinet.net (77.67.74.102) 74.290 ms

Really good numbers.

 

[Amitz]

I considered coming down, (...) My sleep is far more valuable than meeting two degenerates that have nothing going for them.

So what now?

"Considering coming down" or "sleeping"?

So you sleep above the data center? Good boy! Own appartments are something for people who do not work...

One really has to :wub:  you, Chris!

 

[drmike]

So what now?

"Considering coming down" or "sleeping"?

So you sleep above the data center? Good boy! Own appartments are something for people who do not work...

One really has to :wub:  you, Chris!

It's just bad conversational English from Chris.      I wouldn't be surprised if datacenter tower starts offering condos though.   They need to do something there to fill all that empty space --- the mall isn't working out.  Perhaps a daycare?

Chris was saying he was asleep and therefore didn't drive into the big bad city for the big event like the rest of his suburban brethren.

Looking forward to the quiet period as BuyVM hits turbo in NJ and Buffalo does its dance.

 

[Francisco]

We don't have a hell of a lot of stock on the east coast I don't think.

For now we just want to get some peace & quiet so I can continue working away at the SSD's. We've not had any new nodes to migrate users to for coming up a week soon.

Francisco

 

[shovenose]

Well in a week or so when things have settled down I'll order an NJ VPS.

btw your ad still says Buffalo

http://i.imgur.com/XRuKOsr.png