What did I even post? I think I simply asked a question in here, didn't make any claims.Hahahahahahaha god this thread is an utter joke. The OP, the post by Manndude and Dustin is beyond laughable
This?The question you "asked" was purposly asked knowing that the answer was wrong and to let people believe what you said was correct.
I'm not for sure if it's true or not, which is why it was presented in the form of a question.Don't you need to show active use of 70-80% of your allocation before ARIN justifies an audit? Has ARIN ever 'revoked' IP space due to hoarding or non-justification of current space?
This thread isn't a joke. It's just the facts, ma'am. Don't start squirming in your Speedos cause someone is looking at your man's stash.Hahahahahahaha god this thread is an utter joke. The OP, the post by Manndude and Dustin is beyond laughable
ISP Additional Requests
ISPs must have efficiently utilized all previous allocations, and at least 80% of their most recent allocation in order to receive additional space. This includes all space reassigned to their customers.
To receive additional address space following the initial allocation, multi-homed organizations must have returned the original IP address space to its provider in its entirety and must provide justification for a new allocation as described above in the section titled Requirements for Requesting Initial Address Space.
Any time an ISP receives a new block of address space, reassignment information should be submitted within 7 days of issuance of the new space. This information is used to demonstrate that the address space received is being efficiently utilized. Also, it will be reviewed to determine an ISP's and its downstream customers' utilization effectiveness if and when additional space is requested in the future.
The question you "asked" was purposly asked knowing that the answer was wrong and to let people believe what you said was correct.
So by your response I take it that CC doesn't utilize anywhere near that much of their allocation? Hmm. I suppose we should all ping ARIN to investigate further: https://www.arin.net/resources/fraud/ // https://www.arin.net/public/fraud/index.xhtml4.2.4.1. Utilization percentage (80%)
ISPs must have efficiently utilized all previous allocations and at least 80% of their most recent allocation in order to receive additional space. This includes all space reassigned to their customers. Please note that until your prior utilization is verified to meet the 80% requirement, ARIN can neither process nor approve a request for additional addresses.
Wow. Well, I know what I'm doing now after my pizza is out of the oven. Thanks.Based on the results of our investigation, ARIN may:
- Reclaim any resources that were issued or transferred based on fraudulent data
- Reclaim any resources registered to a defunct organization that has no successor eligible to transfer the resources
- Revert any unauthorized changes and replace them with valid information
- Require a transfer of resources to the registrant’s successor
ARIN has so much to deal with they probably overlook some key details. They've learned how to work the system is all.I feel bad for CC + CVPS. They are capable, but this IP collection schema. Crap, the trolls online sniffed it and some academic at a prestigious university smacked lips about it...
ColoCrossing Makes List of Largest ARIN Free Pool IP Acquirers in 2013 is nearly an exact title taken from the professor's paper.
The joke is ARIN allows this behavior and large issuance of IPs to companies that aren't utilizing prior issued ranges and that ARIN isn't reclaiming IPs when those justifying the allocation move out / on / away from CC and similar hoarding companies.
If you read the paper you will see the whole IPV6 avoidance and even some cost/value numbers when shortage hits.
Hell, I'll gladly audit CC's issuance and justification applications for FREE.ARIN has so much to deal with they probably overlook some key details. They've learned how to work the system is all.
Hosting providers do fall under the ISP guidelines, yes. End-user is totally different than what webhosts are providing.If they fall under ISP they can request IPs six months out supply wise. Can't see growth at CC legitimately involving the use of over 100k more IPs in next six months. But you know I have my bias like that and managed to master counting to large numbers beyond 10.
Plenty of time to criticize posts relating to your "upstream" that you "share office space with", but not enough regarding your UGVPS company I see. Merry Christmas.The question you "asked" was purposly asked knowing that the answer was wrong and to let people believe what you said was correct.
Only have to provide information related to your last IP allocation from ARIN. Your older allocations are assumed to be no different than the information you provided for it when you applied for your new block (or at least very minimal changes in allocations assigned). They ask you to give a % of utilization of all prior blocks, but no other documentation.Also, if you can show at least 80% assigned for all previous assignements either through SWIP or rWHOIS they will usually approve you once they do some vetting.
Unfortunately ARIN is a relatively small team with regular requests for IP space from a very large amount of providers. They DO have a policy to investigate IP requests in great detail, but these are typically reserved for some of the very-largest allocations. The entire system operates under an honor system, which it should be able to use without much incident. Some people just feel the need to abuse every situation for whatever gain they can, unfortunately.The joke is ARIN allows this behavior and large issuance of IPs to companies that aren't utilizing prior issued ranges and that ARIN isn't reclaiming IPs when those justifying the allocation move out / on / away from CC and similar hoarding companies.
Perhaps he got tired of being the princess of the pair, and wanted to try being the shining knight for a change. Except in this case, instead of a dramatic rescue of his lover it was more of a tragic stumble on dismount, then trying to have drunken sex with the horse.Plenty of time to criticize posts relating to your "upstream" that you "share office space with", but not enough regarding your UGVPS company I see. Merry Christmas.
Not true.They DO have a policy to investigate IP requests in great detail, but these are typically reserved for some of the very-largest allocations.