DomainBop
Dormant VPSB Pathogen
Two observations about that statement:the client did need slapped down for making the decision to spend $100 and signing up for 2 years in the first place
1. The people on LET/WHT who shout "it's the customers fault so they deserve whatever they got" the loudest tend to be people who make their living working a day job for someone else's company because their part-time business isn't bringing in enough to pay their bills. . Maybe, just, maybe, one of the reasons why their part-time business doesn't bring in enough money to support them (or to support paying actual employees instead of hiring poorly paid contractors) is because of the poor attitude they have towards customers.
2. Customers should do their research and read reviews BUT nowhere in either the US or NY State consumer protection laws (and NY state where CVPS is based has some of the most pro-consumer laws in the US) does it state that the customers rights are diminished if they don't do their research so by law he didn't need to get slapped down. When a consumer spends $100 and signs up with a service provider for 2 years they are doing so with the expectation that the company they are buying from is advertising its products and services, and the quality of those services, truthfully and accurately, and not engaging in false advertising. If the company is falsely advertising its product then it is the one which needs to get slapped down.
Good job to whichever LET admin or mod once again tried to hide a negative CVPS thread from the search engines by putting it in off topic and sinking it.
Quoting a LET member from that thread today (http://lowendtalk.com/discussion/comment/879171/#Comment_879171 )
Can we get a show of hands of all of the LET/B admins/mods who have never received free credits/services from a provider (according to a GVH post on WHT today, mpkossen isn't among that group who has never accepted free services from a provider because GVH did give him free credits )That said, I'm also wondering like you and others. About the fact that obviously "Careful! Snake. Will bite" seems to not keep away quite many from putting their hand into the box anyway. Wondering also that LEB/LET still tolerates that company that I (subjectively and maybe wrongly) perceive as being dangerously close to the edge of scamming.
While I certainly agree that personal attacks on LEB/LET staff is not acceptable, I'm wondering why that very staff seems to not have any problems at all to keep CVPS and their offers active here rather than banning CVPS for some time. This leaves me under the impression that attacking/lying to/scamming/betraying LEB/LET members (by e.g. CVPS) seems perfektly OK to the LEB/LET staff.
I don't know about you and others but frankly, that attitude makes me wonder whether it wouldn't be advisable to stay away from the companies represented by J. Biloh, mpkossen, and other staff, too. Well noted, I do not know a single bad thing about those companies but, being a human, I can't help but to become mistrusting.
Last edited by a moderator: