GreenValueHost tells their non high paying clients to GTFO
- Thread starter Kadar
- Start date
- Status
Seems like sending this info out before a merger/transfer/client-giveaway is the first thing you'd sort out.
"Hey guys, we're giving you away! Here is the info you need to make this a little less painful for you: ..."
drmike
100% Tier-1 Gogent
Nah just throw the customers in the chipper... I mean who is dumb enough to order such unbelievable deals from such unlikely superheros, I mean 'yuts.
You know how many low end companies I've seen use the term "FUCK THE CUSTOMER"? Tons, mostly in private.
Sad to say, but customers weren't handed off to competent folks, obviously. New IPs, new nameservers.... WTF? Why is that even necessary. Neither HVH nor GVH has their own allocations and just absorb random CC small blocks like most everyone over there does. Nothing to update the SWiP and call it a day.
I bet HVH wants to shed customers inherited here. Seen that skit too many times. Customers not worth the account and setup. Let them sit offline until the bitch and force allocation.
Call it f'up 101. Teach me more.
You know how many low end companies I've seen use the term "FUCK THE CUSTOMER"? Tons, mostly in private.
Sad to say, but customers weren't handed off to competent folks, obviously. New IPs, new nameservers.... WTF? Why is that even necessary. Neither HVH nor GVH has their own allocations and just absorb random CC small blocks like most everyone over there does. Nothing to update the SWiP and call it a day.
I bet HVH wants to shed customers inherited here. Seen that skit too many times. Customers not worth the account and setup. Let them sit offline until the bitch and force allocation.
Call it f'up 101. Teach me more.
Last edited by a moderator:
GVH-Jon
Banned
We included as much useful information as possible (including the nameservers of the server in which accounts were being migrated to) that we were provided. We didn't leave any information out that we knew of, and I am 100% sure of that.
Anything further has to be addressed to Hudson Valley Host unfortunately as that's as far as I am able to be of assistance :unsure:
Last edited by a moderator:
I would definitely seek some help if you are having these thoughts of suicide. It is probably not that wise to say this either, notions that your remaining customers are still at risk. However I guess admitting it is the first step to treatment.
GVH-Jon
Banned
Thank You for your concern, however the suicidal thoughts statement was meant as a figure of speech, meaning that it would have drove me absolutely insane and I wouldn't be able to live with myself if I didn't reply.
And yet you offer unlimited disk/bandwidth offers on said 'SSD based cloud'.
The best part is I think you and the "HostNun" are getting your milk from the exact same cow.
Now, with that being said, I've not read your TOS at all to see what limits are imposed on the unlimited diskspace. It's very much possible you allow no backup storage, no large files, & no streaming media of any sort, keeping your actual usage quite low.
Francisco
That's actually very reasonable but it's going to bite them when some wanna-be-redtube signs up and hoards a couple hundred gigs.
Francisco
Indeed Muhahahahahahahahahahahahahhahahahahhaha XD.
But but but but but, it is very unique data that I am data mining and have running on a dedicated server
. Please Fran, can I can I can I
?Mun
Except for the space unavailable to your customers you got rid of.Mun you're more than welcome to try us out
GVH-Jon
Banned
Our old customers that were transferred away are still more than welcome to purchase a cloud hosting plan and request to be transferred back over to us. In fact, we've actually been contacted a few times from our old customers regarding this and I've told them the same exact thing -- they're more than welcome back. In addition to that, Hudson Valley Host is honoring the same pricing and same disk space/bandwidth allocations for clients that have been transferred over meaning that they still can use all the space that they've purchased with us.
Last edited by a moderator:
Woa
So its actually a worse situation than we all think.
What kind of twisted game are you playing with people?
edit
So its actually a worse situation than we all think.
Here you directly confirming that you basically told your old customers to piss off even though space is available, because they had no value.Mun you're more than welcome to try us out
This is now stating that those customers you told to piss off are more than welcome back as long as they are valuable again.
What kind of twisted game are you playing with people?
edit
No shit, they value them as customers unlike you did.
Last edited by a moderator:
GVH-Jon
Banned
I mean this in the nicest way possible, Rogan; please do not put words in my mouth.
If you have fully read what I've posted in my previous posts regarding why customers were transferred over, you would understand what I'm trying to say. It's not the clients that are not valuable, it's the legacy plans and the old platform that are not valuable. No matter how much we loved our clients, they had to go because our Code of Ethics prevented us from modifying their pricing and changing their plans. We love our clients which is why we'd be more than happy to have them back -- but the legacy plans and old platform .. there's no way they're coming back.
If you have fully read what I've posted in my previous posts regarding why customers were transferred over, you would understand what I'm trying to say. It's not the clients that are not valuable, it's the legacy plans and the old platform that are not valuable. No matter how much we loved our clients, they had to go because our Code of Ethics prevented us from modifying their pricing and changing their plans. We love our clients which is why we'd be more than happy to have them back -- but the legacy plans and old platform .. there's no way they're coming back.
I don't mean to pick nits but what kind of "Code of Ethics" prefers terminating clients opposed to offering them an upgrade? You could even give them a discount to compensate for the deprecation of your legacy plans and platform.
Was there any real reason you needed to ditch them so rapidly?
Was there any real reason you needed to ditch them so rapidly?
GVH-Jon
Banned
It wasn't a decision that was made quickly. We've been considering it for weeks before we actually executed the decision.
We believe that it is unethical to have someone pay for a certain plan and basically force them to upgrade to another plan, regardless if it's discounted. I have already provided the reasons for why we are no longer supporting our srv1 and srv2 legacy plans in my previous posts, and Hudson Valley Host was willing to honor the plans that we offered. We believe that it was the only ethical and moral solution to transfer them over to a better home where they will be able to be hosted on an infrastructure that can support our now-deprecated plans and prices without compromise.
It wasn't a decision that was made quickly. We've been considering it for weeks before we actually executed the customer. - FIXED
- Status