I see no reason I cannot voice my observations here. Don't pretend that you're not aware of what goes on - the only reason you post that feedback-suggestions link is to 1) make it look like you're actually going to do something about it, and 2) try to draw traffic to your site.
I thinks that way works better for VPSB. When someone has to write "the board that should not be named" it sounds like a very cool ad. What does that board have that LEB doesn't like links to?
So, how about that disclaimer of ownership in the footer that I asked about in the feedback thread, after you asked me to post the question there?
AFAIK @mpkossen is not the only administrator there. There are 3 other known administrators: Spirit, Jon Biloh, and Alex Vial. I think he has done his best there.
Unfortunately I tend to judge people on the company that they keep. He lost all my respect when he didn't deal with Chris Fabozzi / UGVPS incident properly and professionally. The fact that ChicagoVPS is still allowed to advertise on the LET/LEB is gong show and a sham.
Now that's transparency. That's the kind of truth we want. No, that does not make you a bad guy for caring about someones privacy.
I might be wrong, but I see it differently. LET/LEB now belongs to ColoCrossing, while UGVPS, ChicagoVPS are ColoCrossing's
In case of why he keep the job, he has his own reason. (Newly married and need extra income, maybe?). At least he is not a cocky guy. 
You can link here from LET. No problem. Last time I saw it was last week, in the OP of a thread. People joke about it, sure. It's been handled badly in the past (on a few occasions), I admit. But it's allowed to link here. I've also made this quite clear on LET a couple of times.
I've kept an eye on the feedback thread for a while after posting in it, and never actually saw a response to what I suggested. I'm not sure what my post is supposed to prove, beyond "joepie91 goes to LET to post in the feedback thread when asked to do so".
The fact that you're asking for a status update here instead of at LET is the reason I'd rather have it at LET, in one central place.
GVH-Jon is legally a minor I believe in his home state.Similar case with GVH, when public found out that they are dealing with someone of illegal business age.
Not to rain on your complimentary treatment of our distinguished guest Mr. Fabozzi, but if he really cared about privacy he would have done the proper things to secure his clients and their info and not had their database float off to the internet public twice. He would have notified "authorities" of the issue and wrote a perma-sticky on his website about policies and procedures implemented so new potential customers would view him as a victim doing the right thing instead of a business that doesn't care or hides the history.
> Continues to dodge the question
Perhaps I'm doing that because the last time I posted about it on LET, I didn't get a response at all. And seeing as you're reading the thread here, and I have assurance that my posts won't magically disappear / be changed / whatever, that seems like a much more viable prospect than asking the same question in the same thread on the same forum where I didn't get a response before. Feel free to respond to my post in the LET feedback thread, and I'll gladly continue there.
Thanks for clarifying that.
Thanks for sticking to the matter and updating everyone. Most folks get stressed and discouraged and disappear sadly.
I never said that he did the right thing, I said it doesn't make you a bad person for caring about privacy. Now that I mention it, anyone notice that HVH has no Privacy Policy listed? They only have a TOS and AUP.
